NLSUI OPAC header image
Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Landmark cases in public law / edited by Satvinder Juss and Maurice Sunkin.

Contributor(s): Publisher: Oxford ; Portland, Oregon : Hart Publishing, 2018Description: xxxviii, 334 pages ; 24 cmContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • unmediated
Carrier type:
  • volume
ISBN:
  • 9781849466035 (hardback)
  • 9781509925834
Subject(s): Additional physical formats: Online version:: Landmark cases in public lawDDC classification:
  • 342.41 23 JUS
LOC classification:
  • KD3930 .L36 2017
Contents:
Contents: Foreword; Preface; Contents; Notes on Contributors; Table of Cases; Table of Legislation; 1; Entick v Carrington [1765] Revisited: All the Kings Horse; I. Introduction; II. The Facts and Issues; III. Why Entick v Carrington is a landmark; 2; Ridge v Baldwin [1964]: Nuff Said -- I. Introduction; II. The Context: Natural Justice in the 1950s; III. The Context: Policing; IV. The Context: The Brighton Conspiracy Trial; V. Reception of the Decision in Ridge v Baldwin; VI. Conclusion; 3; Padfield v Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food [1968]: Judges and Parliamentary Democracy1. I. IntroductionII. Background; III. The Issues; IV. The Court Decisions; V. Lord Morris""s Dissent; VI. The Aftermath36; VII. Padfield and the Constitutional Architecture; VIII. Conclusions; 4; Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission [1968]: In Perspective; I. The Suez Crisis and its Consequences; II. Sinai Mining""s Dealings with the Egyptians; III. The UK Government Establishes the Egypt Fund; IV. Anisminic""s Application to the Foreign Compensation Commission; V. Anisminic Launches a Challenge to the Determination; VI. The First-Instance Judgment of Browne J. VII. The Commission and the Foreign Office Decide Whether to AppealVIII. The Court of Appeal""s Judgment; IX. Anisminic""s Appeal to the House of Lords; X. The Ratio; XI. Responses to the Judgment 1: Legislation; XII. Reception of the Judgment 2: The Commission re-determines Anisminic""s Claim; XIII. The Demise of Anisminic Ltd; XIV. Anisminic""s Long-term Significance; 5; Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1984]: Reviewing the Prerogative; I. Introduction; II. The Place of the GCHQ Judgment in the Development of Modern Administrative Law. III. Reviewability of the PrerogativeIV. GCHQ-The Prerogative in the Lords; V. Datafin; VI. Conclusion; 6; The Factortame Litigation: Sovereignty in Question; I. Introduction; II. Facts of the Factortame Case in the Context of Britain""s Maritime History; III. The Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and the Merchant Shipping Act 1988; IV. The Litigation; V. The Factortame Aftermath; VI. Impact on the UK""s Legal System; VII. Sovereignty in Question; VIII. Conclusion; 7; M v The Home Office [1992]: Ministers and Injunctions; I. Introduction; II. A Tangled Tale: How It All Came About. III. Putting the Rule of Law ""back on the rails"": Part One Proceedings for Contempt of CourtIV. Putting the Rule of Law ""back on the rails"": Part Two Judicial Review and the Coercion of Ministers; V. The Enforcement of Injunctions against Ministers: Why Have no Ministers Been Sent to Gaol?; VI. The Scottish Dimension; VII. Conclusion; 8; A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005]: The Belmarsh Case; I. Introduction; II. The Anti-Terrorism Crime and Security Act 2001; III. The Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998; IV. The issues before the House of Lords; V. The House of Lords"" Decision.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Status Date due Barcode
BOOKs BOOKs National Law School 342.41 JUS (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available 37078

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Contents: Foreword; Preface; Contents; Notes on Contributors; Table of Cases; Table of Legislation; 1; Entick v Carrington [1765] Revisited: All the Kings Horse; I. Introduction; II. The Facts and Issues; III. Why Entick v Carrington is a landmark; 2; Ridge v Baldwin [1964]: Nuff Said --
I. Introduction; II. The Context: Natural Justice in the 1950s; III. The Context: Policing; IV. The Context: The Brighton Conspiracy Trial; V. Reception of the Decision in Ridge v Baldwin; VI. Conclusion; 3; Padfield v Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food [1968]: Judges and Parliamentary Democracy1. I. IntroductionII. Background; III. The Issues; IV. The Court Decisions; V. Lord Morris""s Dissent; VI. The Aftermath36; VII. Padfield and the Constitutional Architecture; VIII. Conclusions; 4; Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission [1968]: In Perspective; I. The Suez Crisis and its Consequences; II. Sinai Mining""s Dealings with the Egyptians; III. The UK Government Establishes the Egypt Fund; IV. Anisminic""s Application to the Foreign Compensation Commission; V. Anisminic Launches a Challenge to the Determination; VI. The First-Instance Judgment of Browne J. VII. The Commission and the Foreign Office Decide Whether to AppealVIII. The Court of Appeal""s Judgment; IX. Anisminic""s Appeal to the House of Lords; X. The Ratio; XI. Responses to the Judgment 1: Legislation; XII. Reception of the Judgment 2: The Commission re-determines Anisminic""s Claim; XIII. The Demise of Anisminic Ltd; XIV. Anisminic""s Long-term Significance; 5; Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1984]: Reviewing the Prerogative; I. Introduction; II. The Place of the GCHQ Judgment in the Development of Modern Administrative Law. III. Reviewability of the PrerogativeIV. GCHQ-The Prerogative in the Lords; V. Datafin; VI. Conclusion; 6; The Factortame Litigation: Sovereignty in Question; I. Introduction; II. Facts of the Factortame Case in the Context of Britain""s Maritime History; III. The Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) and the Merchant Shipping Act 1988; IV. The Litigation; V. The Factortame Aftermath; VI. Impact on the UK""s Legal System; VII. Sovereignty in Question; VIII. Conclusion; 7; M v The Home Office [1992]: Ministers and Injunctions; I. Introduction; II. A Tangled Tale: How It All Came About. III. Putting the Rule of Law ""back on the rails"": Part One Proceedings for Contempt of CourtIV. Putting the Rule of Law ""back on the rails"": Part Two Judicial Review and the Coercion of Ministers; V. The Enforcement of Injunctions against Ministers: Why Have no Ministers Been Sent to Gaol?; VI. The Scottish Dimension; VII. Conclusion; 8; A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005]: The Belmarsh Case; I. Introduction; II. The Anti-Terrorism Crime and Security Act 2001; III. The Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998; IV. The issues before the House of Lords; V. The House of Lords"" Decision.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.