The WTO and international Trade / Dispute Settlement

Contents – Acknowledgements Introduction Petros C. Mavroidis and Alan O. Sykes PART I THE FUNCTION OF THE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT SYSTEM 1. Kyle Bagwell and Robert W. Staiger (2002), 'Enforcement', in The Economics of the World Trading System, Chapter 6, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, 95-110, references 2. Monika Butler and Heinz Mauser (2000), 'The WTO Dispute Settlement System: A First Assessment from an Economic Perspective', Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 16 (2), October, 503-33 3. Warren F. Schwartz and Alan O. Sykes (2002), The Economic Structure of Renegotiation and Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organization', Journal of Legal Studies, XXXI (1, Part 2), January, S179-S204 4. Joel P. Trachtman (1999), The Domain of WTO Dispute Resolution', Harvard International Law Journal, 40 (2), Spring, 333-77 PART II THE STANDARD OF REVIEW 5. Steven P. Croley and John H. Jackson (1996), 'WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review, and Deference to National Governments', American Journal of International Law, 90 (2), April, 193-213 6. William J. Davey (2001), 'Has the WTO Dispute Settlement System Exceeded Its Authority? A Consideration of Deference Shown by the System to Member Government Decisions and its Use of Issue-Avoidance Techniques', Journal of International Economic Law, 4(1), March, 79-110 7. Alan O. Sykes (2002), 'Domestic Regulation, Sovereignty, and Scientific Evidence Requirements: A Pessimistic View', Chicago Journal of International Law, 3 (2), Fall, 353-68 8. Michael Trebilcock and Julie Soloway (2002), 'International Trade Policy and Domestic Food Safety Regulation: The Case for Substantial Deference by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body under the SPS Agreement', in Daniel L.M. Kennedy and James D. Southwick (eds), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec, Chapter 18, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 537-74 PART III REMEDIES IN THE WTO LEGAL SYSTEM 9. Kym Anderson (2002), 'Peculiarities of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement', World Trade Review, I (2), 123-34 235
10. Steve Charnovitz (2001), 'Rethinking WTO Trade Sanctions', American Journal of International Law, 95 (4), October, 792-832 247 11. Susan Esserman and Robert Howse (2003), 'The WTO on Trial', Foreign Affairs, 82 (1), January/February, 130-40 288 12. Wilfred J. Ethier (2002), 'Unilateralism in a Multilateral World', Economic Journal, 112 (479), April, 266-92 299 13. Gary N. Horlick (2002), 'Problems with the Compliance Structure of the WTO Dispute Resolution Process', in Daniel L.M. Kennedy and James D. Southwick (eds), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec, Chapter 21, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 636-45 326 14. Robert E. Hudec (2002), The Adequacy of WTO Dispute Settlement Remedies: A Developing Countries Perspective', in Bernard Hoekman, Aaditya Mattoo and Philip English (eds), Development, Trade, and the WTO: A Handbook, Chapter 10, Washington, DC: World Bank, 81-91, references 336 15. Giovanni Maggi (1999), The Role of Multilateral Institutions in International Trade Cooperation', American Economic Review, 89 (1), March, 190-214 348 16. Petros C. Mavroidis (2000), 'Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place', European Journal of International Law, 11 (4), 763-813 373 17. Joost Pauwelyn (2000), 'Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules are Rules - Toward a More Collective Approach', American Journal of International Law, 94 (2), April, 335-47 424 PART IV PARTICIPATION IN THE WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT SYSTEM 18. Marc L. Busch and Eric Reinhardt (2001), 'Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: Early Settlement in GATT/WTO Disputes', Fordham International Law Journal, 24 (1-2), November-December, 158-72 439 19. Henrik Horn, Petros C. Mavroidis and Hakan Nordstrom (1999), 'Is the Use of the WTO Dispute Settlement System Biased?', CEPR Discussion Paper, 2340, 1-30 454 PART V UNILATERAL ENFORCEMENT OF WTO LAW20. Jagdish Bhagwati (1990), 'Aggressive Unilateralism: An Overview', in Jagdish Bhagwati and Hugh T. Patrick (eds), Aggressive Unilateralism: America's 301 Trade Policy and the World Trading System, Chapter 1, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 487 The WTO and International Trade Law/Dispute Settlement 21. Helen Milner (1990), 'The Political Economy of U.S. Trade Policy: A Study of the Super 301 Provision', in Jagdish Bhagwati and Hugh T. Patrick (eds), Aggressive Unilateralism: America's 301 Trade Policy and the World Trading System, Chapter 5, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 163-80 532 22. Alan O. Sykes (1992), 'Constructive Unilateral Threats in International Commercial Relations: The Limited Case for Section 301', Law and Policy in International Business, 23 (2), 263-330 550 PART VI GOVERNANCE 23. Marco C.E.J. Bronckers (1999), 'Better Rules for a New Millennium: A Warning Against Undemocratic Developments in the WTO', Journal of International Economic Law, 2, 547-66 621 24. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann (2002), 'Constitutionalism and WTO Law: From a State-Centred Approach Towards a Human Rights Approach in International Economic Law', in Daniel L.M. Kennedy and James D. Southwick (eds), The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec, Chapter 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 32-67 641 25. J.H.H. Weiler (2001), 'The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats: Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement', Journal of World Trade, 35 (2), April, 191-207 677 Name Index 695