Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOOKs | National Law School | Reference | 340.1 SAM (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 36601 |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 333-346) and index.
General introduction -- What was the contribution of the medieval civilians? -- What was the contribution of the Roman lawyers? -- What was the contribution of the later civilians and the common lawyers? -- What is the institutional legacy? -- What is the legal literature legacy? -- How do legal reasoners treat facts? -- Is legal reasoning like medical reasoning? -- Is legal reasoning like reasoning in film studies? -- Is legal reasoning based on fictions? -- Can legal reasoning be rethought? -- Rethinking legal reasoning: should jurists take interests more seriously? -- Should jurists take interests more seriously (continued)? .
"'Rethinking' legal reasoning seems a bold aim given the large amount of literature devoted to this topic. In this thought-provoking book, Geoffrey Samuel proposes a different way of approaching legal reasoning by examining the topic through the context of legal knowledge (epistemology). What is it to have knowledge of legal reasoning?"
There are no comments on this title.