NLSUI OPAC header image

Regulation of Patent Monopoly under Competition Law

By: Contributor(s): Publication details: Bangalore NLSIU 2011Description: 76p
Contents:
CONTENTS Certificate; Declaration ; Acknowledgement ; List of Abbreviations ; Table of Legislation ; Table of Conventions and Treaties ; Table of Agreements and MOU; Abstract ; Objective of study; Research methodology; Hypotheses; Research question; Limitation; Mode of citation; 1. Introductory ; History, evolution and object of patent and competition law ; . Does patent monopoly promote competition? ; 3.1. Patent monopoly is an instrument to promote competition; 3.2. Patent monopoly may affect the competition; 3.3. Jurisprudential analysis of abuse of right; 3.4. Abuse of patent monopoly; • Refusal to grant licence; • Imposing unreasonable conditions while granting licence; • Price practices; • Excessive pricing; • Price fixing; • Predatory pricing; • Price squeeze; • Discrimination; • Refusal to deal; • Tie-in restrictions; • Patent package; • Patent pooling; • Grant-back; Principles for determining anti-competitive practices regarding patent abuse ; 4.1. Patentees' monopoly right and obligations in India; 4.2. Patent right as chose in action: 43. Duties of patentee under Indian Patent law; 4.4. Rules for determining effect on competition: Concept of Rule of reason and per se rule; 4.5. End of "per se rule" in U.S. for patent ties case; 4.6. Under Indian competition law the "per se rule" or "shall presume rule" lies in vacuum, if applied to regulate patent monopoly; 4.7 Regulation of patent monopoly in India by the application of "rule of reason"; 4.8 Abuse of patent monopoly under Section4 of the Competition Act, 2002; 5. Where the remedy lies in case of interface between patent and competition law? ; 5.1 Jurisdictional conflict in U.S.; 5.2. Jurisdictional conflict in EU; 5.3. Regulation of patent abuse under Canadian Competition law; 5.4. Where the remedy lies in competition issues arising from patent; infringement dispute in India?; 6. International regime to regulate the competition and IPRs (patents) interface ; 6.1. Paris Convention and NAFT A; 6.2. TRIPS standard; 6.3. Havana Charter and Draft International Antitrust Code; 7. Extraterritorial enforcement jurisdictional conflict to regulate patent monopoly ; 7.1. Effects doctrine; 7.2. Bilateral co-operation; 7.3. Multilateral co-operation; 7.3.1. Multilateral Agreement; 7.3.2. Role of OECD; 7.3.3. Role of UNCTAD; Conclusion ; Suggestions ; References ;
Summary: Indian Patent Law Patent Monopoly - Competition Law Patent Monopoly Rights - India
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Status Date due Barcode
Dissertation Dissertation National Law School Not for loan LLM367

CONTENTS
Certificate;
Declaration ;
Acknowledgement ;
List of Abbreviations ;
Table of Legislation ;
Table of Conventions and Treaties ;
Table of Agreements and MOU;
Abstract ;
Objective of study;
Research methodology;
Hypotheses;
Research question;
Limitation;
Mode of citation;
1. Introductory ;
History, evolution and object of patent and competition law ;
. Does patent monopoly promote competition? ;
3.1. Patent monopoly is an instrument to promote competition;
3.2. Patent monopoly may affect the competition;
3.3. Jurisprudential analysis of abuse of right;
3.4. Abuse of patent monopoly;
• Refusal to grant licence;
• Imposing unreasonable conditions while granting licence;
• Price practices;
• Excessive pricing;
• Price fixing;
• Predatory pricing;
• Price squeeze;
• Discrimination;
• Refusal to deal;
• Tie-in restrictions;
• Patent package;
• Patent pooling;
• Grant-back;
Principles for determining anti-competitive practices regarding patent abuse ;
4.1. Patentees' monopoly right and obligations in India;
4.2. Patent right as chose in action:
43. Duties of patentee under Indian Patent law;
4.4. Rules for determining effect on competition: Concept of Rule of reason and per se rule;
4.5. End of "per se rule" in U.S. for patent ties case;
4.6. Under Indian competition law the "per se rule" or "shall presume rule" lies in vacuum, if applied to regulate patent monopoly;
4.7 Regulation of patent monopoly in India by the application of "rule of reason";
4.8 Abuse of patent monopoly under Section4 of the Competition Act, 2002;
5. Where the remedy lies in case of interface between patent and competition law? ;
5.1 Jurisdictional conflict in U.S.;
5.2. Jurisdictional conflict in EU;
5.3. Regulation of patent abuse under Canadian Competition law;
5.4. Where the remedy lies in competition issues arising from patent; infringement dispute in
India?;
6. International regime to regulate the competition and IPRs (patents) interface ;
6.1. Paris Convention and NAFT A;
6.2. TRIPS standard;
6.3. Havana Charter and Draft International Antitrust Code;
7. Extraterritorial enforcement jurisdictional conflict to regulate patent monopoly ;
7.1. Effects doctrine;
7.2. Bilateral co-operation;
7.3. Multilateral co-operation;
7.3.1. Multilateral Agreement;
7.3.2. Role of OECD;
7.3.3. Role of UNCTAD;
Conclusion ;
Suggestions ;
References ;

Indian Patent Law Patent Monopoly - Competition Law Patent Monopoly Rights - India

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.