

| Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Materials specified | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOOKs
|
NLS | Reference | 340.1 SAM (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | HB | Available | 36601 |
1. General introduction;
2. What was the contribution of the medieval civilians?;
3. What was the contribution of the Roman lawyers?;
4. What was the contribution of the later civilians and the common lawyers?;
5. What is the institutional legacy?;
6. What is the legal literature legacy?;
7. How do legal reasoners treat facts?;
8. Is legal reasoning like medical reasoning?;
9. Is legal reasoning like reasoning in film studies?;
10. Is legal reasoning based on fictions? -- Can legal reasoning be rethought?;
11. Rethinking legal reasoning: should jurists take interests more seriously?;
12. Should jurists take interests more seriously (continued)?.
"'Rethinking' legal reasoning seems a bold aim given the large amount of literature devoted to this topic. In this thought-provoking book, Geoffrey Samuel proposes a different way of approaching legal reasoning by examining the topic through the context of legal knowledge (epistemology). What is it to have knowledge of legal reasoning?"