NLSUI OPAC header image

Evaluation of Transfer Pricing Methods: With Regards to Intangibles

By: Contributor(s): Publication details: Bangalore NLSIU 2020Description: 85pOnline resources:
Contents:
Contents ABBREVIATION ; CASES MENTIONED ; INTRODUCTION ; THE NEED FOR THE STUDY ; STATEMENT OF PROBLEM ; AIMS AND OBJECTIVE; IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY ; LIMITATION ; REVIEW OF LITERATURE ; RESEARCH PROBLEM ; HYPOTHESIS ; RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ; SECONDARY RESOURCE ; CHAPTERISATION ; CHAPTER 1: INTANGIBLES UNDER OECD GUIDELINES; OECD/ G20 BASE EROSION AND PROFIT SHIFTING PROJECT SHIFTING PROJECT ; AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER VI OF THE TRANSFER PRICING GUIDELINES ; I. IDENTIFYING THE INTANGIBLES ; II. OWNERSHIP OF INTANGIBLES AND TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING THE DEVELOPMENT, ENHANCEMENT, MAINTENANCE, PROTECTION AND EXPLOITATION OF INTANGIBLES: ; III. CONTRACTUAL TERMS RELATING TO OWNERSHIP OF INTANGIBLES; TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING THE USE OR TRANSFER OF INTANGIBLES ; SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE FOR DETERMINING ARM’S LENGTH CONDITION IN CASES INVOLVING INTANGIBLES ; COMPARISION OF RISK IN CASES INVOLVING TRANSFERS OF INTANGIBLES ; INDIA’S POSITION ON OECD ; CHAPTER 2 – CONCEPTS OF TRANSFER PRICING ; TRANSFER PRCING METHODS ; I. The Comparable uncontrolled price (CUP) method ; II. Resale Price Method ; III. Cost Plus Method ; TRANSACTIONAL PROFIT METHODS ; DEMPE: Six Steps for Analyzing Transaction Involving Intangibles ; CHAPTER 3 GLOBAL FORMULARY APPORTIONMENT ; CHAPTER 4 HARD-TO-VALUE INTANGIBLE ; CHAPTER 5 EVOLUTION OF TRANSFER PRICING IN INDIA ; ISSUES INVOLVED: I. COMPARABILITY ANALYSIS: II. RISK FACTORS ; III. Arm’s Length Range ; IV. But the difficulty in using the range is, there is no availability of 6 comparable or it is difficult to find comparables. ; JUDICIAL TRENDS REGARDING INTANGIBLES IN INDIA ; CONCLUSION ; BIBLIOGRAPHY .
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Status Barcode
Dissertation . Not for loan LLM841

Contents
ABBREVIATION ;
CASES MENTIONED ;
INTRODUCTION ;
THE NEED FOR THE STUDY ;
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM ;
AIMS AND OBJECTIVE;
IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY ;
LIMITATION ;
REVIEW OF LITERATURE ;
RESEARCH PROBLEM ;
HYPOTHESIS ;
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ;
SECONDARY RESOURCE ;
CHAPTERISATION ;
CHAPTER 1: INTANGIBLES UNDER OECD GUIDELINES;
OECD/ G20 BASE EROSION AND PROFIT SHIFTING PROJECT SHIFTING PROJECT ;
AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER VI OF THE TRANSFER PRICING GUIDELINES ;
I. IDENTIFYING THE INTANGIBLES ;
II. OWNERSHIP OF INTANGIBLES AND TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING THE DEVELOPMENT, ENHANCEMENT, MAINTENANCE, PROTECTION AND EXPLOITATION OF INTANGIBLES: ;
III. CONTRACTUAL TERMS RELATING TO OWNERSHIP OF INTANGIBLES;
TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING THE USE OR TRANSFER OF INTANGIBLES ;
SUPPLEMENTAL GUIDANCE FOR DETERMINING ARM’S LENGTH CONDITION IN CASES INVOLVING INTANGIBLES ;
COMPARISION OF RISK IN CASES INVOLVING TRANSFERS OF INTANGIBLES ;
INDIA’S POSITION ON OECD ;
CHAPTER 2 – CONCEPTS OF TRANSFER PRICING ;
TRANSFER PRCING METHODS ;
I. The Comparable uncontrolled price (CUP) method ;
II. Resale Price Method ;
III. Cost Plus Method ;
TRANSACTIONAL PROFIT METHODS ;
DEMPE: Six Steps for Analyzing Transaction Involving Intangibles ;
CHAPTER 3 GLOBAL FORMULARY APPORTIONMENT ;
CHAPTER 4 HARD-TO-VALUE INTANGIBLE ;
CHAPTER 5 EVOLUTION OF TRANSFER PRICING IN INDIA ;
ISSUES INVOLVED:
I. COMPARABILITY ANALYSIS:
II. RISK FACTORS ;
III. Arm’s Length Range ;
IV. But the difficulty in using the range is, there is no availability of 6 comparable or it is difficult to find comparables. ;
JUDICIAL TRENDS REGARDING INTANGIBLES IN INDIA ;
CONCLUSION ;
BIBLIOGRAPHY .