Library Catalogue
A study on afspa in the light of international human rights law
Niksungla
A study on afspa in the light of international human rights law - BangaloreBangalore NLSIU 2014 - 129 p. ; 25 cm.
TABLE OF CONTENTS a. CERTIFICATE; b. DECLARATION; c. ACKNOWLEDGMENT; d. ABSTRACT; e. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY; f. LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS; I. INTRODUCTION; II. ARMED FORCES (SPECIAL POWERS) ACT; 2.1. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF AFSPA; 2.2. ANALYSIS OF AFSPA; 2.3. OPPOSITION TO AFSPA; 2.4. ATROCITIES COMMITTED IN THE NAME OF LAW AND ORDER; 2.5. STAND OF THE ARMY ON AFSPA; 2.6. EXTENSION OF AFSPA; 2.7. OBSERVATION; III. CONSTITUTIONALITY V. UNCONSTITUTIONALITY; 3.1. ARGUMENTS AGAINST AFSPA CONSTITUTIONALITY; 3.2. COMMITTEE'S REPORT ON AFSPA; 3.3. VALIDITY OF AFSPA 3.4. SUPREMECOURTONAFSPA; 3.5. SIMILAR PROVISIONS; 3.6. ARMY ON VIOLATION OF AFSPA; 3.7. OBSERVATION ; IV. AFSPA AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW: THE CONTRAST; 4.1. IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERNATIONAL LEGAL OBLIGATIONS IN INDIA; 4.2. THE ACT ADVERSELY IMPACTS ON INDIA'S INTERNATIONAL STANDING; 4.3. INTERNATIONAL PARADIGM 4.4. INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS; 4.5. INTERNATIONAL CUSTOMARY LAW ; 4.6. INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW ; 4.7. NARROW DEFINITION OF ARMED CONFLICT BY THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA IS A HURDLE VIS-A-VIS CEDAW; 4.8. ALTERNATE SOLUTION ; 4.9. OBSERVATION ; V. THE AFSPA: WHY IT IS REQUIRED?; VI. CONCLUDING REMARKS; VII. BIBLIOGRAPHY; VIII. ANNEXURE-A; IX. ANNEXURE- B ; X. ANNEXURE- C ; XI. ANNEXURE – D.
A study on afspa in the light of international human rights law - BangaloreBangalore NLSIU 2014 - 129 p. ; 25 cm.
TABLE OF CONTENTS a. CERTIFICATE; b. DECLARATION; c. ACKNOWLEDGMENT; d. ABSTRACT; e. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY; f. LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS; I. INTRODUCTION; II. ARMED FORCES (SPECIAL POWERS) ACT; 2.1. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF AFSPA; 2.2. ANALYSIS OF AFSPA; 2.3. OPPOSITION TO AFSPA; 2.4. ATROCITIES COMMITTED IN THE NAME OF LAW AND ORDER; 2.5. STAND OF THE ARMY ON AFSPA; 2.6. EXTENSION OF AFSPA; 2.7. OBSERVATION; III. CONSTITUTIONALITY V. UNCONSTITUTIONALITY; 3.1. ARGUMENTS AGAINST AFSPA CONSTITUTIONALITY; 3.2. COMMITTEE'S REPORT ON AFSPA; 3.3. VALIDITY OF AFSPA 3.4. SUPREMECOURTONAFSPA; 3.5. SIMILAR PROVISIONS; 3.6. ARMY ON VIOLATION OF AFSPA; 3.7. OBSERVATION ; IV. AFSPA AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW: THE CONTRAST; 4.1. IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERNATIONAL LEGAL OBLIGATIONS IN INDIA; 4.2. THE ACT ADVERSELY IMPACTS ON INDIA'S INTERNATIONAL STANDING; 4.3. INTERNATIONAL PARADIGM 4.4. INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS; 4.5. INTERNATIONAL CUSTOMARY LAW ; 4.6. INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW ; 4.7. NARROW DEFINITION OF ARMED CONFLICT BY THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA IS A HURDLE VIS-A-VIS CEDAW; 4.8. ALTERNATE SOLUTION ; 4.9. OBSERVATION ; V. THE AFSPA: WHY IT IS REQUIRED?; VI. CONCLUDING REMARKS; VII. BIBLIOGRAPHY; VIII. ANNEXURE-A; IX. ANNEXURE- B ; X. ANNEXURE- C ; XI. ANNEXURE – D.