Library Catalogue
Is right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition and relief and rehabilitation act 2013 a relief for land acquisition act, 1894?
Abhilash Naik
Is right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition and relief and rehabilitation act 2013 a relief for land acquisition act, 1894? - BangaloreBangalore NLSIU 2014 - 90 p. ; 25 cm.
Contents CHAPTER-I ; 1. Introduction ; 1.1. Research methodology ; a. Research objective ; b. Research Methodology and Source of Data; 1.2. Hypothesis ; 1.3. Research questions ; 1.4. Division of Chapters ; CHAPTER-II ; 2. Concept of Private Property and its Safeguards ; 2.1. Introduction ; CHAPTER-III ; Issues in Land acquisition act of 1894 ; 3.1. Introduction to LAA 1894 ; 3.1.1. Impact of LAA 1894 ; 3.2. Main Issues of LAA 1894 ; 3.2.1. Acquisition for private companies ; 3.2.2. The assumption of the Governments with regards to willingriess of the seller selling his land; 3.2.3. Disputes over compensation ; 3.2.4. The misuse of definition of Public Purpose; 3.2.5. Market Value Determination ; 3.2.6. Development Induced Displacement- ; 3.2.7. Social Impact Assessment; 3.2.8. Time/Cost Overruns due to Protest Induced Delays ; CHAPTER-IV ; The right to fair compensation and transparency in land Acquisition rehabilitation and resettlement Act 2013 (RFCTLARR) ; 4.1. Introduction ; 4.2. The outlook of concerns addressed by 2013 Act; 4.3. The new process to acquire the land in RFCTLARR ; . 4.4. Land Acquisition for private companies ; 4.5. Use of Public Purpose ; 4.6. Rehabilitation and Resettlement (hereinafter R&R) ; 4.6.1. Exceptions found in R& R planning ; 4.6.2. Resettlement and Rehabilitation benefits to all affected families (in addition to compensation) ; 4.7. Consent provisions of RFCTLARR ; 4.7.1. Consent of Affected land Owners ; 4.7.2. Consent of Gram Sabha ; 4.7.3. Role of appropriate government for consent provisions ; 4.8. Award calculation under RFCTLARR 2013 ; 4.9. Process timelines ; 4.10. Comparison of LAA and RFCTLARR and National Thermal Power Corporation (hereinafter NTPC) R&R policy ; 4.11 . Defects found in the act and the clarity needed in certain areas ; Chapter-5 ; 5. Case laws under LAA of 1894 and the trends followed for providing compensation in Karnataka ; A Sri K Narasimhamurthy v/s State of Karnataka by its secretary ; B. Smt. D.K. Saraswathamma v/s State of Karnataka ; C. Sukumar v/s the competent authority for land acquisition national highways authority of India ; D. Venkatamma v/s additional land acquisition officer, Bangalore Development authority ; E. Andanappa v/s LAO OF BOA ; F. MIs TTK Prestige Limited v/s the special land acquisition officer, National highways PWD Buildings, K.R.Circle Bangalore ; 5.2. The various problems raised/identified in the above discussed case laws ; 5.3. Remedy for the above issues in the New Law ; CHAPTER-VII ; Conclusion ; Suggestions and Recommendations for further actions ; BIBLIOGRAPHY.
Is right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition and relief and rehabilitation act 2013 a relief for land acquisition act, 1894? - BangaloreBangalore NLSIU 2014 - 90 p. ; 25 cm.
Contents CHAPTER-I ; 1. Introduction ; 1.1. Research methodology ; a. Research objective ; b. Research Methodology and Source of Data; 1.2. Hypothesis ; 1.3. Research questions ; 1.4. Division of Chapters ; CHAPTER-II ; 2. Concept of Private Property and its Safeguards ; 2.1. Introduction ; CHAPTER-III ; Issues in Land acquisition act of 1894 ; 3.1. Introduction to LAA 1894 ; 3.1.1. Impact of LAA 1894 ; 3.2. Main Issues of LAA 1894 ; 3.2.1. Acquisition for private companies ; 3.2.2. The assumption of the Governments with regards to willingriess of the seller selling his land; 3.2.3. Disputes over compensation ; 3.2.4. The misuse of definition of Public Purpose; 3.2.5. Market Value Determination ; 3.2.6. Development Induced Displacement- ; 3.2.7. Social Impact Assessment; 3.2.8. Time/Cost Overruns due to Protest Induced Delays ; CHAPTER-IV ; The right to fair compensation and transparency in land Acquisition rehabilitation and resettlement Act 2013 (RFCTLARR) ; 4.1. Introduction ; 4.2. The outlook of concerns addressed by 2013 Act; 4.3. The new process to acquire the land in RFCTLARR ; . 4.4. Land Acquisition for private companies ; 4.5. Use of Public Purpose ; 4.6. Rehabilitation and Resettlement (hereinafter R&R) ; 4.6.1. Exceptions found in R& R planning ; 4.6.2. Resettlement and Rehabilitation benefits to all affected families (in addition to compensation) ; 4.7. Consent provisions of RFCTLARR ; 4.7.1. Consent of Affected land Owners ; 4.7.2. Consent of Gram Sabha ; 4.7.3. Role of appropriate government for consent provisions ; 4.8. Award calculation under RFCTLARR 2013 ; 4.9. Process timelines ; 4.10. Comparison of LAA and RFCTLARR and National Thermal Power Corporation (hereinafter NTPC) R&R policy ; 4.11 . Defects found in the act and the clarity needed in certain areas ; Chapter-5 ; 5. Case laws under LAA of 1894 and the trends followed for providing compensation in Karnataka ; A Sri K Narasimhamurthy v/s State of Karnataka by its secretary ; B. Smt. D.K. Saraswathamma v/s State of Karnataka ; C. Sukumar v/s the competent authority for land acquisition national highways authority of India ; D. Venkatamma v/s additional land acquisition officer, Bangalore Development authority ; E. Andanappa v/s LAO OF BOA ; F. MIs TTK Prestige Limited v/s the special land acquisition officer, National highways PWD Buildings, K.R.Circle Bangalore ; 5.2. The various problems raised/identified in the above discussed case laws ; 5.3. Remedy for the above issues in the New Law ; CHAPTER-VII ; Conclusion ; Suggestions and Recommendations for further actions ; BIBLIOGRAPHY.