Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Schabas William A

International criminal law Vol. III - London Edward Elgar 2012 - 901p ix

Contents:
Volume-III;
Acknowledgments;
An introduction to all three volumes by the editor appears in Volume I;

PART-I-THE AD HOC AND ‘HYBRID’ TRIBUNALS, AND NATIONAL SYSTEMS;
1. M. Cherif Bassiouni (1994), ‘The Commission of Experts Established pursuant to Security Council Resolution 780: Investigating Violations of International Humanitarian Law in the Former Yugoslavia’;
2. Patricia M. Wald (2001), ‘The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Comes of Age: Some Observations on Day-to-Day Dilemmas of an International Court’;
3. Daryl A. Mundis (2005), ‘The Judicial Effects of the “Completion Strategies” on the Ad Hoc International Criminal Tribunals’;
4. David Wippman (2006), ‘The Costs of International Justice’;
5. Mirko Klarin (2004), ‘The Tribunal’s Four Battles’;
6. William A. Schabas (2009), ‘Anti-Complementarity: Referral to National Jurisdictions by the UN International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda’;
7. Laura A. Dickinson (2003), ‘The Promise of Hybrid Courts’;
8. Mark S. Ellis (2004), ‘Coming to Terms with its Past – Serbia’s New Court for the Prosecution of War Crimes’;
9. Leila Sadat Wexler (1994), ‘The Interpretation of the Nuremberg Principles by the French Court of Cassation: From Touvier to Barbie and Back Again’;

PART-II-THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT;
10. Olympia Bekou and Robert Cryer (2007), ‘The International Criminal Court and Universal Jurisdiction: A Close Encounter?’;
11. William W. Burke-White (2008), ‘Proactive Complementarity: The International Criminal Court and National Courts in the Rome System of International Justice’;
12. Andrew T. Cayley (2008), ‘The Prosecutor’s Strategy in Seeking the Arrest of Sudanese President Al Bashir on Charges of Genocide’;
13. Allison Marston Danner (2003), ‘Enhancing the Legitimacy and Accountability of Prosecutorial Discretion at the International Criminal Court’;
14. Margaret M. deGuzman (2009), ‘Gravity and the Legitimacy of the International Criminal Court’;
15. Mohamed El Zeidy (2002), ‘The United States Dropped the Atomic Bomb of Article 16 of the ICC Statute: Security Council Power of Deferrals and Resolution 1422’;
16. Silvia A. Fernández de Gurmendi and Håkan Friman (2000), ‘The Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Court’;
17. Valerie Oosterveld, Mike Perry and John McManus (2002), ‘The Cooperation of States with the International Criminal Court’;
18. Sienho Yee (1996), ‘A Proposal to Reformulate Article 23 of the ILC Draft Statute for an International Criminal Court’;
19. David J. Scheffer (2001), ‘A Negotiator’s Perspective on the International Criminal Court’;
20. William A. Schabas (2000), ‘Life, Death and the Crime of Crimes: Supreme Penalties and the ICC Statute’;
21. Ray Murphy (2006), ‘Gravity Issues and the International Criminal Court’;
22. Rod Rastan (2008), ‘What is a “Case” for the Purpose of the Rome Statute?’;
23. Nicolaos Strapatsas (2002), ‘Universal Jurisdiction and the International Criminal Court’;
24. Carsten Stahn (2005), ‘Complementarity, Amnesties and Alternative Forms of Justice: Some Interpretative Guidelines for the International Criminal Court’;
25. Carsten Stahn, Mohamed M. El Zeidy and Héctor Olásolo (2005), ‘The International Criminal Court’s Ad hoc Jurisdiction Revisited’;
26. M. Cherif Bassiouni (2010), ‘Perspectives on International Criminal Justice’.

ISBN: 9781848449756

Subjects--Topical Terms:
1. Internaitonal Criminal Courts2. International Offences 3. International Criminal Law

Dewey Class. No.: 341.77 / SCH-III