Library Catalogue
A Study on the Patentability of Financial Innovations in India (Record no. 111205)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 10987nam a2200193Ia 4500 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
| control field | OSt |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20251125112504.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 210518s2011 xx 000 0 und d |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE | |
| Transcribing agency | nls |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Nithyananda K.V |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | A Study on the Patentability of Financial Innovations in India |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc. | Bangalore |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | NLSIU |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2011 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 624p |
| 505 ## - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE | |
| Formatted contents note | Table of Contents<br/>Chapter – 1: Introduction <br/>Introduction; <br/>Financial Innovations and the Patent Regime; <br/>Research inquiry and objectives; <br/>Scope of the study; <br/>Methodology; <br/>Sources of data; <br/>Techniques of Data Collection; <br/>Data Analysis; <br/>Limitations of the Study; <br/>Chapterization; <br/>Chapter – 2: Financial Innovation; <br/>Introduction; <br/>Financial Engineering; <br/>Financial System; <br/>Financial Innovation;<br/>Financial innovations ecosystem; <br/>Features of financial services; <br/>Nature of Financial Innovations; <br/>Industry responses on the financial innovation scenario in India; <br/>Categories of Financial Innovations; <br/>Analysis of the categories of financial innovation; <br/>Sources of Financial Innovations and rationale for such innovative activities; <br/>Motivations for Financial Innovations; <br/>Industry responses on motivations for financial innovation in India; <br/>Other aspects about financial innovations; <br/>Financial Engineer as an Inventor; <br/>Roles assumed by the Financial Engineer; <br/>Tools of Financial Engineer; <br/>Financial Engineering Team; <br/>Chapter – 3: Protecting Financial Innovations; <br/>Introduction;<br/>Need for protecting financial innovations; <br/>Protecting financial innovations;<br/>Components of financial innovation and protection; <br/>Alternative modes of protecting financial innovations; <br/>First-Mover Advantage;<br/>Tacit Knowledge and Trade Secret;<br/>Reputational Advantage; <br/>Copyright Advantage; <br/>Trademark Advantage; <br/>Patents Advantage;<br/>Sample Financial Patent granted in the US; <br/>Industry Response on protecting financial innovations in India; <br/>Summary; <br/>Chapter – 4: Political Economy of Patenting Financial Innovations; <br/>Introduction; <br/>Part 1; Social Impact of the Financial Innovation; <br/>Introductory Remarks; <br/>Measuring Social Impact of financial innovations; <br/>Concluding remarks; <br/>Part 2; Debate on the Patenting of Financial Innovations; <br/>Introductory Remarks; <br/>Section 1; Rationale for Patents; <br/>The Classical Approach to Patent Protection; <br/>The Medieval Approach to the grant of patent rights; <br/>The Modem Arguments for Patent Protection to financial innovations; <br/>Summary and Conclusion; <br/>Section 2: Debate on the Need for Patenting Financial Innovations; <br/>Introduction; <br/>Model adapted for the debate;<br/>Factors considered for the debate; <br/>1 Time taken for innovation ; <br/>2 Investment in research and development; <br/>3 Technological Risk; <br/>4 Replication Risk; <br/>5 Public funding; <br/>6 Availability of alternative modes of protection ;<br/>7 Importance / value of disclosure; <br/>8 Network Effects ;<br/>9 Clarity of Rights and Due Diligence Costs; <br/>10 Leveraging / Misuse Potential / Anticompetitive symptoms; <br/>11 Financial Strength of the Inventor / Investor ; <br/>12 Cumulativeness of Innovation; <br/>13 Effectiveness of Licensing Institutions; <br/>14 Other Abuse Problems ; <br/>Summary of the comparative study of biotechnology sector and financial sector ; <br/>Findings, Observations and Conclusions of Part 2 of the Chapter; <br/>Part 3 - Social Impact of patenting financial innovations in India ; <br/>Introductory Remarks; <br/>Patent System in India; <br/>Social Impact of granting patent protection to financial innovations; <br/>Concluding Remarks; <br/>Conclusion to the Chapter; <br/>Chapter – 5: Legal Position on Patenting Financial Innovations in the US; <br/>Introduction; <br/>Legal Position in the US; <br/>History of Patentability of Financial Innovations; <br/>I Pre-Gottschalk Phase; <br/>1 Business Method Patents Prior to Hotel Security Case; <br/>a Early Beginnings; <br/>b [1854] O'Reilly vs Morse - The Telegraph Case; <br/>c [1867) Munson vs The Mayor, Etc, of New York; <br/>d [1874] Rubber Tip Pencil Company vs Howard; <br/>e [1877) Cochrane vs Deener ; <br/>f [1881] Waring vs Johnson; <br/>g [1881] Dugan vs Gregg ; <br/>h [1881] Tilghman vs Proctor ;<br/>i [1892] Thomson vs Citizens' National Bank of Fargo;<br/>j [1893] United States Credit System Co vs American Credit Indemnity Co; <br/>k [1894] Johnson et al vs Johnston ; <br/>1 [1894] Benjamin Menu Card Company vs Rand, McNally & Company; <br/>m [1898] Safeguard Account Co vs Wellington ; <br/>n [1903] Hocke vs New York Central & Hartford Railroad Company; <br/>2 [1908] Hotel Security Checking Company vs Lorraine Company; <br/>Reasoning of the court; <br/>" Art" under Hotel Security; <br/>"Business Method" under Hotel Security; <br/>Synthesis; <br/>Analysis and Interpretation of Hotel Security Case; <br/>3 Business Method Patents Post Hotel Security Case; <br/>a [1910] Berardini vs Tocci; <br/>b [1911] Rand McNally & Company vs Exchange Scrip-Book Company; <br/>c [1913] Cincinnati Traction vs Pope; <br/>d [1930] American Fruit Growers, Inc vs Brogdex Company; <br/>e [1934] In re Wait; <br/>f [1939] MacKay Radio & Telegraph Co vs Radio Corporation of America; <br/>g [1942] In re Patton; <br/>h [1948] Funk Brothers vs Kalo Company; <br/>i [1949] Loew's Drive-in Theatres, Inc vs Park-in Theatres, Inc; <br/>j [1965] In re Wiechers; <br/>k [1968) In re Howard; <br/>1 [1972) In re Waldbaum; <br/>4 Afterthoughts on Pre-Gottschalk Phase; <br/>II Gottschalk to State Street Phase; <br/>1 [1972] Gottschalk vs Benson; <br/>Invention; <br/>Decision in Gottschalk vs Benson; <br/>Analysis of Gottschalk vs Benson; <br/>2 Cases after Gottschalk vs Benson; <br/>a [1973) In re Fox; <br/>b [1974) In re Johnston; <br/>c [1976) In re Chatfield; <br/>d [1977) In re Deutsch; <br/>e [1978) Parker vs Flook ; <br/>f [1979] In re Maucorps; <br/>g [1980) Diamond vs Chakrabarty ;<br/>h [1981] Diamond vs Diehr; <br/>i Freeman-W alter-Abele Test ;<br/>j [1983] Paine, Webber vs Merrill Lynch ; <br/>k [1988] Ex parte Murray; <br/>l [1989] In re Grams; <br/>m [1992] Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc vs Corazonix Corp; <br/>n [1994] In re Schrader ; <br/>3 [1994] En banc decision in In re Alappat; <br/>Background; <br/>Technology in Alappat ; <br/>Decision in Alappat ; <br/>Analyzing In re Alappat ; <br/>4 Afterthoughts on Gottschalk to State Street Bank Phase; <br/>III State Street Bank and later Phase; <br/>1 [1998] State Street Bank vs Signature Financial; <br/>Background ;<br/>Invention and Technology; <br/>Decision in the State Street Bank; <br/>Analysis of State Street Bank ;<br/>2 Cases after State Street Bank;<br/>a [1999] A T & T Corp vs Excel Communications, Inc ; <br/>b [2001] Amazoncom vs Barnesandnoblecom;<br/>c [2002] Marketel International, Inc vs Pricelinecom, Inc ;<br/>d [2002] Keen, Inc vs InfoRocketcom, Inc ;<br/>e [2004] Ex parte Lundgren; <br/>f [2006] LabCorp vs Metabolite ;<br/>g [2006] Ex Parte Bilski; <br/>h [2007] Netflix vs Blockbuster ; <br/>i [2007] In re Comiskey; <br/>j [2007] In re Nuijten; <br/>k [2008] In re Bilski; <br/>1 [2010] Bilski vs Kappos; <br/>m Post Bilski Phase; <br/>Summary of the Legal Position in the US; <br/>Chapter – 6: Legal Position on Patenting Financial Innovations in Europe; <br/>Introduction and Background;<br/>What can be patented in Europe;<br/>Invention; <br/>Industrial application; <br/>Novelty; <br/>Inventive Step;<br/>Position of Mathematical algorithm;<br/>Position of Business Method Patents; <br/>Position of Computer Software Programs;<br/>Historical Development of Jurisprudence in Europe; <br/>a [1987] Vicom! Computer-Related Invention; <br/>b [1988] Koch and Sterzel! X-ray Apparatus case; <br/>c [1989] Merrill Lynch's Application! Automated Securities Trading System;<br/>d [1990] IBM's Invention! Word Processing - Computer related Invention;<br/>e [1990] IBM's Invention! Document Abstracting and Retrieving; <br/>f [1991] Gale's Invention / New method of Calculation; <br/>g [1993] IBM's Invention / Card Reading System; <br/>h [1995] Sohei's Invention / General-purpose Management System; <br/>i [1995] Pettersson's Invention / QueuMg System; <br/>j [1998] IBM's Invention / External Interface Simulation; <br/>k [2001] AT&T's Invention / Computer System; <br/>1 [2001] Pension Benefit System Partnership; <br/>m [2003] Comvik's Invention / Two identities; ; <br/>n [2004] Hitachi's Invention / Auction Method; <br/>o [2005] Catalina's Invention / Discount Certificates; <br/>p [2005] Online Resources' Invention / Banking Services; <br/>q [2006] Duns Licensing Associates' Invention / Estimating Sales Activity; <br/>r [2006] MAN's Invention / Provision of Product Specific Data; <br/>s [2006] ED Pool's Invention / International Transaction; <br/>t [2007] Pitney Bowes' Invention / Undeliverable Mail; <br/>u [2007] King's Invention / Loan System; <br/>v [2008] Ricoh's Invention / Order Management; <br/>Analysis of the European Position on the Patentability of Financial Innovations Determining Technical Character; <br/>Determining inventive step; <br/>Skilled Person; <br/>Determining Non-obviousness of an invention <br/>Conclusion to the chapter <br/>Chapter – 7: A Look at the Financial Innovation related patent applications in the US and<br/>Europe; <br/>Introduction; <br/>Data Selection; <br/>Analysis; <br/>Chapter – 8: Legal Position on Patenting Financial Innovations in Other International<br/>Jurisdictions; <br/>Introduction; <br/>Argentina; <br/>Australia; <br/>Brazil; <br/>Canada; <br/>China; <br/>Japan; <br/>Malaysia; <br/>Mexico; <br/>Singapore; <br/>South Africa; <br/>South Korea; <br/>Taiwan; <br/>Conclusion; <br/>Chapter – 9: Legal Position on Patenting Financial Innovations as per TRIPS Agreement Position of TRIPS; <br/>Technical invention as the subject of Patent Protection; <br/>Invention; <br/>Technicality; <br/>Patent Types; <br/>Product Patents; <br/>Process Patents; <br/>Implications of TRIPS agreement on certain kinds of inventions; <br/>Discoveries; <br/>Computer Software; <br/>Exclusion from Patentability on the grounds of Public Interest; <br/>Ordre Public; <br/>Protection of Morality; <br/>Conclusion <br/>Chapter – 10: Legal Position on Patenting Financial Innovations in India; <br/>Introduction; <br/>What can be patented in India?;<br/>Utility; <br/>Novelty; <br/>Obviousness; <br/>Specification; <br/>Non-Patentable Inventions; <br/>Patents for Business Methods, Mathematical Algorithms and Computer Programs; <br/>Introduction and Evolution; <br/>Computer Software Patents in India; <br/>Conclusion; <br/>Analysis of the patents granted for financial innovations in India; <br/>Summary of the data analysis; <br/>Chapter -11: Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations; <br/>Summary; <br/>Conclusions and Recommendations; <br/>Scope for future research; <br/>Appendix; <br/>Appendix 1 - Strategic Framework for protecting financial innovations; <br/>Appendix 2 - Questionnaire used to collect the Primary Data; <br/>Appendix 3 - List of financial innovations carried out in the western world; <br/>Appendix 4 - Patent applications filed with the IPO;<br/>References; <br/> |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Financial Innovation - Patenting |
| -- | Financial Innovation - Protection |
| -- | Patenting Financial Innovation - Social Impact - India |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Dr. T Ramakrishna - Guide |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://dans.nls.ac.in/handle/123456789/508">https://dans.nls.ac.in/handle/123456789/508</a> |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Source of classification or shelving scheme | Dewey Decimal Classification |
| Koha item type | Thesis |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Barcode | Date last seen | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | . | 21.05.2018 | PhD039 | 21.05.2018 | 21.05.2018 | Thesis |