Library Catalogue
An Analysis of Behavioural Impact of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 on Key Stakeholders (Record no. 207693)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 04237nam a2200181Ia 4500 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
| control field | OSt |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20210720114550.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 210206s2020 xx 000 0 und |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE | |
| Transcribing agency | . |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Shreya |
| 245 #3 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | An Analysis of Behavioural Impact of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 on Key Stakeholders |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc. | Bangalore |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | NLSIU |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2020 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 78p. |
| 505 ## - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE | |
| Formatted contents note | TABLE OF CONTENTS<br/>TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ;<br/>I. INTRODUCTION ;<br/>1.1 Statement of Problem ;<br/>1.2 Importance of Study ;<br/>1.3 Aims and Objectives ;<br/>1.4 Hypothesis ;<br/>1.5 Research Questions ;<br/>1.6 Research Methodology ;<br/>1.7 Mode of Citation ;<br/>1.8 Scope and Limitations of the Study ;<br/>1.9 Review of Literature ;<br/>1.9.1 Research Gap ;<br/>1.9.2 Contributions of the Study ;<br/>1.10 Chapter Scheme ;<br/>II. THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE: A ‘LAW AND ECONOMICS’ PERSPECTIVE ;<br/>2.1 An ‘Adjusted’ Form of Efficiency Approach ;<br/>2.2 Combining Efficiency Approach with the Principles of Behavioural Economics;<br/>III. OUTPUTS OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ;<br/>3.1 Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process by Different Stakeholders ;<br/>3.2 Status of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process initiated ;<br/>3.2.1 Time period elapsed since the date of admission of ongoing cases ;<br/>3.2.2 Reasons for Withdrawal of CIRP under Section 12A of the Code ;<br/>3.2.3 Status of Liquidation Process and Reasons for Liquidation ;<br/>3.3 An Analysis of Key Findings ;<br/>IV. BEHAVIOURAL RESPONSES OF KEY STAKEHOLDERS DURING THE CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS: CASE STUDIES ;<br/>4.1 Essar Steel Case: Status and Role of Different Stakeholders in the Insolvency Resolution Process ;<br/>4.1.1 Reconciling the Creation of New Classes of Creditors with the Traditional Classification of Secured Creditors and Unsecured Creditors ;<br/>4.1.2 Nature of the Role of the Resolution Professional and the Committee of Creditors ;<br/>4.1.3 Bindingness of Approved Resolution Plan: Incentivizing Resolution Applicants? ;<br/>4.1.4 Sanctity of Statutory Time Period for Completion of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process: The Legislature vs. Adjudicating Authorities ;<br/>4.2. Jaypee Infratech Case: A Critical Appraisal of its Legal and Practical Implications for the Real Estate Sector ;<br/>4.2.1 Obliteration of Raison d'être of Distinction between the Operational and Financial Creditors ;<br/>4.2.2 Probable Misuse of the Code by the Real Estate Allottees: Approach of the Adjudicating Authorities and Need for a Re-look ;<br/>4.2.3 The Supreme Court's Interpretation of Preferential Transactions and its Implications for Third-party Security ;<br/>4.3 Binani Cements Case: A Critical Appraisal of the Justiciability of Approved Resolution Plans ;<br/>4.3.1 Treatment of Operational Creditors and Dissenting Financial Creditors under the Resolution Plan: Role of the Adjudicating Authorities ;<br/>4.3.2 Role of Adjudicating Authorities vis à vis Commercial Wisdom of the Committee of Creditors;<br/>4.4. Amtek Auto Case: Consequences of Non-Implementation of Approved Resolution Plan;<br/>4.4.1 Manner of Pursuing Criminal Complaints under the Code and the Role of Adjudicating Authorities ;<br/>4.4.2 Due Diligence during Distressed Mergers and Acquisitions: Issues and Challenges ;<br/>4.5 An Analysis of the Trends Emerging from the Case Studies ;<br/>4.5.1 The Adjudicating Authorities and the Courts have Tended to Exercise their Authority Improperly. ;<br/>4.5.2 Amendments to the Code are Mostly Case Driven and Lack Conceptual Coherence ;<br/>4.5.3 There are Gaps in the Realisation of Objectives of ‘Speedy Resolution’ and ‘Value Maximisation’ ;<br/>V. REFORMING THE CORPORATE INSOLVENCY FRAMEWORK: CRITIQUES AND PERSPECTIVES ;<br/>5.1 Role of Promoters as Key Stakeholders in the Resolution Process: Is Ineligibility under Section 29A economically efficient? ;<br/>5.2 Schemes of Compromise or Arrangement and Sale on 'Going Concern Basis' in Liquidation: Has the Code ceded its Outcome-neutrality? ;<br/>5.3 Pre-packaged Schemes: Whether Feasible in Indian Insolvency Regime? ;<br/>VI. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS ;<br/>BIBLIOGRAPHY .<br/> |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Prof. (Dr.) O. V. Nandimath - Guide |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="http://opac.nls.ac.in:8081/xmlui/handle/123456789/423">http://opac.nls.ac.in:8081/xmlui/handle/123456789/423</a> |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Koha item type | Dissertation |
| Source of classification or shelving scheme | Dewey Decimal Classification |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Barcode | Date last seen | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | . | 06.02.2021 | LLM838 | 06.02.2021 | 06.02.2021 | Dissertation |