Library Catalogue
The separation of powers and legislative interference in judicial process : Constitutional principles and limitations (Record no. 35633)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 04303nam a2200229Ia 4500 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
| control field | OSt |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20210705165921.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 160316s2010 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER | |
| International Standard Book Number | 9781841136615 |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE | |
| Transcribing agency | . |
| 082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER | |
| Classification number | 347.010000 |
| Item number | GER |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Gerangelos Peter |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | The separation of powers and legislative interference in judicial process : Constitutional principles and limitations |
| 250 ## - EDITION STATEMENT | |
| Edition statement | Rep |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc. | Oxford |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | Hart Publishing |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2010 |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
| Extent | 338p |
| Dimensions | xvii |
| 365 ## - TRADE PRICE | |
| Price amount | Gratis |
| 505 ## - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE | |
| Formatted contents note | Contents,<br/>Acknowledgements;<br/>Table of Cases;<br/>Table of Legislation;<br/>1 Introduction; <br/> I. The Relevant Scenarios;<br/> II. Definitional Difficulties;<br/> III. The Original Legal Entrenchment of the Doctrine and the Underlying Rationale;<br/> IV. The Possibility of General Principles and Interpretational Methodology;<br/> V. The Purposive Nature of The Separation of Powers Doctrine;<br/> VI. The Problem of Definition and the Formalist Approach;<br/> VII. Core Branch Functions?;<br/>2 Legislative Interference in the Pending Case Scenario: The Foundation of Principle and the Australian Position;<br/> I. Introduction;<br/> II. The Australian Constitutional Position and the Early Australian Constitutional Scholars;<br/> III. Early Development of Principle by the High Court ;<br/> IV. The Foundation of a Discrete Set of Principles Governing the Pending Case Scenario:Liyanage;<br/> V. Consolidation of Principle Post-Liyanage;<br/> VI. The Direction Principle at the Crossroads: Nicholas v The Queen;<br/> VII. The Uncertain Status of the Direction Principle in Australia;<br/>3 Legislative Interference with Judicial Functions: The Jurisprudence of the United States, Evaluation of Principle, and Towards Resolution;<br/> I. Introduction;<br/> II. The Emergence of the Changed Law Rule and the Direction Principle in the United States;<br/> III. Klein and Its Uncertain Meaning;<br/> lV. Hart's Thesis and the United States Foundation of the Direction Principle;<br/> V. The Decline of the Direction Principle: The Robertson case;<br/> VI. Robertson's Uncertain Legacy: Plaut v Spendthrift Farm Inc;<br/> VII. Klein Qualified, Overruled or Misinterpreted? Miller v French;<br/> VIII. The Schiavo Litigation;<br/> IX. Further Confirmation of the Direction Principle;<br/> X. General Conclusions on the Separation of Powers and the Pending Case Scenario;<br/> XI. Towards a Resolution;<br/> XII. A Reformulated Direction Principle;<br/> XIII. Speculative Propositions;<br/> XIV.Conclusion;<br/>4 The Separation of Powers and Final Judgments: Defining the Principle Limiting Legislative Revision of Final Judgments;<br/> I. Introduction and Definition of Final Judgment;<br/> II. Reflections on Finality Where the Separation Doctrine is Not Entrenched;<br/> III. A Middle Case: India;<br/> IV. Early Australian Commentary on the Constitutional Protection of Final Judgments;<br/> V. The Current Australian Position;<br/> VI. Qualifications;<br/> VII. A Reinforcement of Australian Jurisprudence: The Irish Position on Final Judgments;<br/> VIII. The United States Supreme Court and Final Judgments;<br/> IX. The Wheeling Bridge Qualification;<br/> X. The Development and Consolidation of Principle by the United States Supreme Court;<br/> XI. The Inviolability Principle Tested: Miller v French;<br/> XII. Conclusion; <br/>5 Qualifications to the Inviolability of Final Judgments and Final Summation;<br/> I. Introduction;<br/> II. The Wheeling Bridge Qualification, the Regulation of Public Rights and 'Conditional' Final Judgments;<br/> III. The Waiver Qualification;<br/> IV. Conclusions on the Final Case Scenario;<br/>6 Protections Afforded Decisional Independence in Jurisdictions without an Entrenched Separation of Powers;<br/> I. Introduction;<br/> II. The United Kingdom and the Separation of Powers;<br/> III. The European Convention on Human Rights;<br/> IV. The United Kingdom, the ECHR and the Human Rights Act 1998;<br/> V. Canons of Statutory Intepretation; 7.Conclusion;<br/>7.Conclution;<br/> |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | 1. Separation Of Powers - U K 2. Judicial Independence 3. Judicial Process |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | |
| -- | |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Source of classification or shelving scheme | Dewey Decimal Classification |
| Koha item type | BOOKs |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | . | 30.05.2017 | 347.01 GER | 31029 | 30.05.2017 | 30.05.2017 | BOOKs |