TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLES OF CASES;
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS;
CHAPTER-l INTRODUCTION;
Methodology;
Scope, Objectives and Significance of the Study;
The scheme of the Chapters;
CHAPTER-2 DEFINITION OF CONTEMPT OF COURT;
CHAPTER-3 ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF CONTEMPT LAW;
CHAPTER-4 PRESENT POSITION IN ENGLAND ABOUT SCANDALIZING THE COURT;
CHAPTER-5 CANADIAN CHARTER AND THE CONTEMPT OF COURT REGARDING THE SCANDALIZING THE COURT;
CHAPTER-6 PRESENT POSITION OF SCANDALISING THE AUSTRALIA;
CHAPTER-7 PRESENT POSITION OF SOUTH AFRICA ON SCANDALISING THE COURTS;
CHAPTER-8 POSITION OF LAW OF CONTEMPT IN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA REGARDING SCANDALIZING THE COURT;
CHAPTER-9 POSITION IN INDIA REGARDING THE SCANDALIZING THE COURT
CASES RELATED TO IMPROPER MOTIVE;
1. Hira Lal Dixit v. State ofU.P AIR 1954 se 743 (Vol 43);
2. Namboodaripadv. T. Narayanan Namibyar1970 (2) sec 325;
3. Perspective Publication Ltd,v. State of Maharashtra(1969) 2; SeR 779 AIR 1971 se 221;
4. In re, S. Mulgaokar AIR 1978 se 727;
5. In Re Shri Sham Lal, (1978) 2 sec 479;
6. Rachapudi Subba Rao Vs The Advocate General, Andhra Pradesh (1981) se 755;
7. National Anthem is conscientious group Vis Mohammed Younus AIR 1987 SC 151: 1987 (3) SCC 89. 173;
8. P.N. Duda v. P. Shiv Shanker, and others 1 AIR 1988 SC 1208;
9. Padhma Hasini alias Padmapriya v. C.R. Srinivas (1999) 8 189 SCC 711;
CASES RELATED TO PARTIALITY;
1. T. Deen Dayal v. High Court of A.P (1997) 7 SCC, p. 535;
CASES REI4TED TO INCOMPETENCY;
1. Bathinam Ramakrishna Reddy Vs State of Madras AIR 1952 198 SC 149,1952 Cr. L.1. 832~ 1952 SCR425: 1952 SCJ 137;
2. Brahma Prakash Sharma VIs state of U.P.;
3. UP Sales Tax Service Association Vs Taxation Bar Association Agra (I 995) SEC 716
4. State Vs Nityananda Mahaputra AIR 1960 Ori 132;
CASES RELATED TO SCURRLIOUS ABUSES;
1. Shri Baradakanta Mishra v. the Registrar of Orissa High Court and another (1974) I SCC 374;
2. M.R. Parashar and Others vIs Dr. Farooq Abdullah and others (1984) 2 SCC 343;
3. In re Vinay Chandra Mishra Case 1995(2) SCC:AIR 1995 (2) 2348;
4. Ravichandran Iyer vIs Justice A.M. Bhatta Charjee and others 1995 SCC (Cri) 953;
5. Dr. D. C. Saxena v. Chief Justice of India, (1996) 2 SCC;
6. Narmada Bacho Anclolan v. Union of India and others, (1999) 8 SCC 308;
7. J.R Parashar Advocate and others v. Prasad Bhushan;
8. Suo motto Arundati Roy;
9. In re: S.K. Sundram Suomotto, (2001) 2SCC171,;
10 CONCLUSIONS ALONG WITH SUGGESTIONS;
BIBLIOGRAPHY;
• Articles;
• Books.