NLSUI OPAC header image
Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Democratic, accountability and the use of force in international law

By: Contributor(s): Publication details: Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2003Description: 460p xxiiISBN:
  • 9780521807470
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 341.500000 KU
Contents:
Contents List of figures; List of tables; Notes on contributors; Preface; List of abbreviations; Part I. Introduction: 1. Broaching the issues Charlotte Ku and Harold K. Jacobson; Part II. The Domestic and International Context: 2. The interface of national constitutional systems with international law and institutions on using military forces: changing trends in executive and legislative powers Lori F. Damrosch; 3. Domestic political factors and decisions to use military forces Karen A. Mingst; 4. Collective security, peacekeeping, and ad hoc multilateralism Edwin M. Smith; 5. The legal responsibility of military personnel Robert C. R. Siekmann; Part III. Traditional Contributors to International Military Operations: 6. Canada: committed contributor of ideas and forces, but with growing doubts and problems Fen Osler Hampson; 7. Norway: political consensus and the problem of accountability Knut G. Nustad and Henrik Thune; 8. India: democratic, poor, internationalist Ramesh Thakur and Dipankar Banerjee; Part IV. Newcomers to International Military Operations: 9. Japan: moderate commitment within legal strictures Akiho Shibata; 10. Germany: ensuring political legitimacy for the use of military forces by requiring constitutional accountability Georg Nolte; Part V. Permanent Members of the UN Security Council: 11. Russian Federation: the pendulum of powers and accountability Bakhtiyar Tuzmukhamedov; 12. France: Security Council legitimacy and executive primacy Yves Boyer, Serge Sur and Olivier Fleurence; 13. The United Kingdom: increasing commitment requires greater parliamentary involvement Nigel D. White; 14. The United States: democracy, hegemony, and accountability Michael J. Glennon; Part VI. Conclusion: 15. Towards a mixed system of democratic accountability Charlotte Ku and Harold K. Jacobson; Appendix A: uses of military forces under the auspices of the UN and NATO; Appendix B: country participation in international operations, 1945-2000; References; Index.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Status Barcode
BOOKs National Law School 341.5 KU (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available 19156

Contents
List of figures;
List of tables;
Notes on contributors;
Preface;
List of abbreviations;
Part I. Introduction:
1. Broaching the issues Charlotte Ku and Harold K. Jacobson;
Part II. The Domestic and International Context:
2. The interface of national constitutional systems with international law and institutions on using military forces: changing trends in executive and legislative powers Lori F. Damrosch;
3. Domestic political factors and decisions to use military forces Karen A. Mingst;
4. Collective security, peacekeeping, and ad hoc multilateralism Edwin M. Smith;
5. The legal responsibility of military personnel Robert C. R. Siekmann;
Part III. Traditional Contributors to International Military Operations:
6. Canada: committed contributor of ideas and forces, but with growing doubts and problems Fen Osler Hampson;
7. Norway: political consensus and the problem of accountability Knut G. Nustad and Henrik Thune;
8. India: democratic, poor, internationalist Ramesh Thakur and Dipankar Banerjee;
Part IV. Newcomers to International Military Operations: 9. Japan: moderate commitment within legal strictures Akiho Shibata;
10. Germany: ensuring political legitimacy for the use of military forces by requiring constitutional accountability Georg Nolte;
Part V. Permanent Members of the UN Security Council:
11. Russian Federation: the pendulum of powers and accountability Bakhtiyar Tuzmukhamedov;
12. France: Security Council legitimacy and executive primacy Yves Boyer, Serge Sur and Olivier Fleurence;
13. The United Kingdom: increasing commitment requires greater parliamentary involvement Nigel D. White;
14. The United States: democracy, hegemony, and accountability Michael J. Glennon;
Part VI. Conclusion: 15. Towards a mixed system of democratic accountability Charlotte Ku and Harold K. Jacobson;
Appendix A: uses of military forces under the auspices of the UN and NATO;
Appendix B: country participation in international operations, 1945-2000;
References;
Index.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.