NLSUI OPAC header image
Local cover image
Local cover image
Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Islands against civilisation : Anthropology, nationalism, and the politics of scheduling, 1918–1950 / By Saagar Tewari

By: Publication details: Bangalore Orient BlackSwan 2025Description: xvi, 504 pages 23 cmISBN:
  • 9789354426483 (Paperback)
DDC classification:
  • 305.80954
Contents:
Abbreviations; List of Images, Maps, and Table; Acknowledgements; Introduction; 1. Spaces of Exception/Regimes of Protection: The Making of the Colonial Administrative Discourse on Scheduling Tribal Areas (1918–1936); 2. Anthropology and Administration: J. H. Hutton and the Formulation of the Tribal Question; 3. J. P. Mills and the Huttonian Paradigm; 4. Uplift, Assimilation, and Socio-Religious Reform: A. V. Thakkar and the Aboriginal Tribes; 5. Framing ‘Backwardness’: Nationalist Responses to the Tribal Question; 6. The Challenge of Backwardness: W. V. Grigson and the Aboriginal Tribes of Central India; 7. Re-examining the Ghurye–Elwin Debate: The Aboriginal Tribe as ‘Backward Hindu’; 8. A Future for the Tribes: The Making of the Fifth and Sixth Schedules of the Indian Constitution; Epilogue; Bibliography; Index.
Summary: In British India, ‘scheduling’ meant the act of placing certain areas under ‘special administrative regimes’, where the usual laws and regulations did not apply. After independence, similar provisions were included in the Constitution of India, in the form of the Fifth and Sixth Schedules, for predominantly tribal areas. This book provides a history of the late-colonial discussions around the future of tribal communities in South Asia. In this debate were first, the British anthropologists and administrators, who believed that the introduction of modern electoral democracy would harm the tribal people. They wished to ‘exclude’ or ‘partially exclude’ all tribal majority areas from the powers of elected assemblies. Against them stood the Indian nationalists, who were opposed to such a policy of territorial separation, seeing it as another instrument of the British policy of divide and rule. Through the story of this history of scheduling, the author brings to life the intellectual debates, political mobilisation, and cultural assertiveness that lay behind the creation of the category of ‘Scheduled Tribes’. Showing the connections between colonial and independent India that remain alive even today, this book offers an understanding of the forces and frameworks that continue to shape the tribal situation in current times.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Shelving location Call number Materials specified Status Notes Date due Barcode
BOOKs National Law School Circulation Counter 305.80954 TEW (Browse shelf(Opens below)) PB Checked out Recommended by Dr. Manpreet Singh Dhillon 03.10.2025 40191

Abbreviations;
List of Images, Maps, and Table;
Acknowledgements;
Introduction;
1. Spaces of Exception/Regimes of Protection: The Making of the Colonial Administrative Discourse on Scheduling Tribal Areas (1918–1936);
2. Anthropology and Administration: J. H. Hutton and the Formulation of the Tribal Question;
3. J. P. Mills and the Huttonian Paradigm;
4. Uplift, Assimilation, and Socio-Religious Reform: A. V. Thakkar and the Aboriginal Tribes;
5. Framing ‘Backwardness’: Nationalist Responses to the Tribal Question;
6. The Challenge of Backwardness: W. V. Grigson and the Aboriginal Tribes of Central India;
7. Re-examining the Ghurye–Elwin Debate: The Aboriginal Tribe as ‘Backward Hindu’;
8. A Future for the Tribes: The Making of the Fifth and Sixth Schedules of the Indian Constitution;
Epilogue;
Bibliography;
Index.

In British India, ‘scheduling’ meant the act of placing certain areas under ‘special administrative regimes’, where the usual laws and regulations did not apply.
After independence, similar provisions were included in the Constitution of India, in the form of the Fifth and Sixth Schedules, for predominantly tribal areas.
This book provides a history of the late-colonial discussions around the future of tribal communities in South Asia. In this debate were first, the British anthropologists and administrators, who believed that the introduction of modern electoral democracy would harm the tribal people. They wished to ‘exclude’ or ‘partially exclude’ all tribal majority areas from the powers of elected assemblies. Against them stood the Indian nationalists, who were opposed to such a policy of territorial separation, seeing it as another instrument of the British policy of divide and rule.
Through the story of this history of scheduling, the author brings to life the intellectual debates, political mobilisation, and cultural assertiveness that lay behind the creation of the category of ‘Scheduled Tribes’. Showing the connections between colonial and independent India that remain alive even today, this book offers an understanding of the forces and frameworks that continue to shape the tribal situation in current times.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Local cover image