NLSUI OPAC header image
Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Domestic judicial review of trade remedies : Experiences of the most active WTO members

By: Contributor(s):
Publication details: Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2013Description: 445p xvISBN:
  • 9781107022232
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 341.754 YIL
Contents:
Contents: 1. Introduction-Müslüm Yilmaz; 2. Canada: High deference, stark reality-Andrew M. Lanouette and Christopher J. Kent; 3. United States: Judicial review: A cornerstone of trade remedies practice-John D. McInerney and Michele D. Lynch; 4. Mexico: Quali-judicial review of trade remedy measures by NAFTA panels-Jorge Miranda and Juan Carlos Partida; 5. Colombia: A complex court system with the possibility of three instances-María Clara Lozano; 6. Brazil: The need for enhanced effectiveness-Rabih Nasser and Luciana B. Costa; 7. Argentina: A well-structured but unsuccessful judicial review system-Mercedes de Artaza; 8. Peru: A sophisticated but underused judicial review system-Luis Alberto Leon and María Antonieta Merino; 9. The European Union: An imperfect and time-consuming system-Edwin Vermulst and Juhi Sud; 10. Turkey: A judicial review system in need of change-Müslüm Yilmaz; 11. Israel: A comparative study of two models-Arie Reich and Gill Nadel; 12. South Africa: A complicated, unpredictable, long and costly judicial review system-Gustav Brink; 13. Pakistan-An evolving judicial review system-Faizullah Khilji and Mazhar Bangash; 14. India: A three-tier judicial review system-Madhurendra Nath Jha; 15. China-An untested theoretical possibility-Henry Gao; 16. The Republic of Korea: Increasing attention and new challenges-Jaemin Lee; 17. Indonesia-A judicial review system in dire need of restructuring-Erry Bundjamin; 18. Australia: Judicial reciew with merits review-Stephen Gageler; 19. Countries with insufficient judicial review activity: Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand and Thailand Osamu Umejima, Edmund Sim, Hugh McPhail, Apisith John Sutham, Pattanan Kalawantavanich and Sakkapol Vachatimanont; 20. Conclusions Müslüm Yilmaz. Index.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Contents:
1. Introduction-Müslüm Yilmaz;
2. Canada: High deference, stark reality-Andrew M. Lanouette and Christopher J. Kent;
3. United States: Judicial review: A cornerstone of trade remedies practice-John D. McInerney and Michele D. Lynch;
4. Mexico: Quali-judicial review of trade remedy measures by NAFTA panels-Jorge Miranda and Juan Carlos Partida;
5. Colombia: A complex court system with the possibility of three instances-María Clara Lozano;
6. Brazil: The need for enhanced effectiveness-Rabih Nasser and Luciana B. Costa;
7. Argentina: A well-structured but unsuccessful judicial review system-Mercedes de Artaza;
8. Peru: A sophisticated but underused judicial review system-Luis Alberto Leon and María Antonieta Merino;
9. The European Union: An imperfect and time-consuming system-Edwin Vermulst and Juhi Sud;
10. Turkey: A judicial review system in need of change-Müslüm Yilmaz;
11. Israel: A comparative study of two models-Arie Reich and Gill Nadel;
12. South Africa: A complicated, unpredictable, long and costly judicial review system-Gustav Brink;
13. Pakistan-An evolving judicial review system-Faizullah Khilji and Mazhar Bangash;
14. India: A three-tier judicial review system-Madhurendra Nath Jha;
15. China-An untested theoretical possibility-Henry Gao;
16. The Republic of Korea: Increasing attention and new challenges-Jaemin Lee;
17. Indonesia-A judicial review system in dire need of restructuring-Erry Bundjamin;
18. Australia: Judicial reciew with merits review-Stephen Gageler;
19. Countries with insufficient judicial review activity:
Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand and Thailand Osamu Umejima, Edmund Sim, Hugh McPhail, Apisith John Sutham, Pattanan Kalawantavanich and Sakkapol Vachatimanont;
20. Conclusions Müslüm Yilmaz.
Index.