Table of contents

1. Introduction
2. Origins of Complicity: The Domestic Law Intake
Introduction
I. The Comparative Method in International Criminal Law
II. Complicity in Domestic Law
III. Lessons Learned from Comparative Studies
Conclusion
3. The Evolution of Complicity as a Construction for Dealing with Collective Criminality
Introduction
I. Conspiracy versus Complicity at Nuremberg and Tokyo
II. Domestic Law versus International Law during the Subsequent Trials
III. Defining the Contours of Complicity: The ILC's Contribution
IV. Historical Trends
4. Complicity in the Jurisprudence of the Ad Hoc Tribunals and Hybrid Courts
Introduction
I. Forms of Participation in the Statutes of the Ad Hoc Tribunals and Hybrid Courts
II. Problems with Building a Coherent Account of Complicity
Conclusion
5. Complicity and the Hierarchy of the Participation Modes at the International Criminal Court
Introduction
I. Modes of Participation at the ICC
II. Hierarchy of the Participation Modes
Conclusion
6. Complicity in International Criminal Law and Law of State Responsibility: A Comparative Analysis
Introduction
I. Complicity in the Law of State Responsibility
II. Comparative Analysis of Complicity in International Criminal Law and the Law of State Responsibility
III. Treatment of Complicity in Two Areas of Law: Common Trends and Divergences
Conclusion
7. The Correlation between Complicity and Sentencing
Introduction
I. The Correlation between Complicity and Sentencing
II. Sentencing Objectives at the Crossroads: Domestic and International Law
III. Embracing Judicial Sentencing Discretion in International Criminal Law
Conclusion
8. Conclusion: The Place of Complicity in International Criminal Law
Introduction
I. The Limitations of International Criminal Law
II. Symbolism as an Overarching Aim
III. Improving the Current Practices of Attaching Liability for Complicity