NLSUI OPAC header image

Just Desert: Sentencing Policy Choice for Eritrea

By: Contributor(s): Publication details: Bangalore NLSIU 2001Description: 123pSubject(s): Online resources:
Contents:
Table of Contents DECLAH.ATION; INTRODUCTION; HYPOTHESIS; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY; METIIODOLOOY; CHAPTERIZATION ; HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND POPULATION DISTRUBUTION; SHORT HISTORICAL OVERVIEW; POPULATION DIVERSITY; CIIAPTER ONE; CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS: AN OVERVIEW OF SENTENCING ; WHAT IS A SENTENCING?; SENTENCE AIMS; Rehabilitation; Deterrent; Justification of Utilitarian and objectives of Deterrel1ts; General Deterrence; Individual Deterrence; Incapacitation; Retribution; Expressive or denunciation retribution; Debt or Expiation theory; Vengeance; Kantian Retribution; Just Desert; CHAPTER TWO; SENTENCITNG: PUNISHMENT OR TREATMENT; PRO- SENTI ~NCI NU JUS'I'II:ICATIONS; Utilitarian -Deterrent justijication; Retributivists' Justification; JUSTIFICATIONS AGAINST SENTENCING; Psychiatric theory; Biological Theory; Do WE HAVE OTHER OPTIONS FOR SENTENCING?; SOCIO-ECONOMIC REMEDY: POVERTY ALLEVIATION PROGRAM; CHAPTER THREE; SENF.NTCING JUSTICE: ERITREAN PERSPECTIVE; INTR()J)UCTION; I. CORRECTIONAL APPROACH OF THE CODE; (a) Treatment; (b) Reforming by restricting personal liberty; (c) Suspension; (d) Conditional Release; II. DETERRENT APPROACH OF THE CODE; III. INCAPACI~, ON APPROACH OF THE CODE; CHAPTER FOUR; DISCRETIONARY POWER - CHALLENGED!; DISCRETIONAI~Y POWER IN ERITREAN COURTS; DOES THE ERITREAN PARLIAMENT HAS THE POWER TO~STRICT?; JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE AND RESTRICTING DISC~ON; CHAPTER FIVE; SENTENCING GUIDELINES ORLAND JUST DESERT CHOICE FOR ERITREA?; MINIMUM MANDATOR Y SENTENCES; "JUST DESERT" – THE LEAST EVIL; CHAPTER SIX ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND JUST DESERT; INTROD1.JCTION; MEDIATION AND 'JUST DESERT;' PLEA BARGAINING AND SENTENCING JUSTICE; CRITICISM ON PLEA BARGAINING; Plea-bargaining and Just Desert; CHAPTER SEVEN; VICTIMS OF CRIME AND JUST DESERT; INTRODUCTION; UNBALANCED TREA1MENT: ACCUSED V VICTIM; LEGAL ANAL YSIS OF VICTIM'S PLACE UNDER ERITREA laws; The Eritrean Constitution and the victim; The Eritrean Penal Code and the victim; The Eritrean criminal procedure and the victim; Victin1s and Civil law; What if the accused is acquitted?; VICTIM REPARATION; RESTITUTION; Critic on restitution; COMPENSATION; Why the State should pay compensation?; Fund from Where? FINE AND VICTIM; MACIIINERY FOR EXECUTION COMPENSATION; 'JUST DESERT' AND TI IE VICTIM ; CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION; BIBIOGRAPIIY.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Status Barcode
Dissertation National Law School Not for loan LLM085

Table of Contents
DECLAH.ATION;
INTRODUCTION;
HYPOTHESIS;
RESEARCH QUESTIONS;
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY;
METIIODOLOOY;
CHAPTERIZATION ;
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND POPULATION DISTRUBUTION;
SHORT HISTORICAL OVERVIEW;
POPULATION DIVERSITY;
CIIAPTER ONE;
CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS: AN OVERVIEW OF SENTENCING ;
WHAT IS A SENTENCING?;
SENTENCE AIMS;
Rehabilitation;
Deterrent;
Justification of Utilitarian and objectives of Deterrel1ts;
General Deterrence;
Individual Deterrence;
Incapacitation;
Retribution;
Expressive or denunciation retribution;
Debt or Expiation theory;
Vengeance;
Kantian Retribution;
Just Desert;
CHAPTER TWO;
SENTENCITNG: PUNISHMENT OR TREATMENT;
PRO- SENTI ~NCI NU JUS'I'II:ICATIONS;
Utilitarian -Deterrent justijication;
Retributivists' Justification;
JUSTIFICATIONS AGAINST SENTENCING;
Psychiatric theory;
Biological Theory;
Do WE HAVE OTHER OPTIONS FOR SENTENCING?;
SOCIO-ECONOMIC REMEDY: POVERTY ALLEVIATION PROGRAM;
CHAPTER THREE;
SENF.NTCING JUSTICE: ERITREAN PERSPECTIVE;
INTR()J)UCTION;
I. CORRECTIONAL APPROACH OF THE CODE;
(a) Treatment;
(b) Reforming by restricting personal liberty;
(c) Suspension;
(d) Conditional Release;
II. DETERRENT APPROACH OF THE CODE;
III. INCAPACI~, ON APPROACH OF THE CODE;
CHAPTER FOUR;
DISCRETIONARY POWER - CHALLENGED!;
DISCRETIONAI~Y POWER IN ERITREAN COURTS;
DOES THE ERITREAN PARLIAMENT HAS THE POWER TO~STRICT?;
JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE AND RESTRICTING DISC~ON;
CHAPTER FIVE;
SENTENCING GUIDELINES ORLAND JUST DESERT CHOICE FOR
ERITREA?;
MINIMUM MANDATOR Y SENTENCES;
"JUST DESERT" – THE LEAST EVIL;
CHAPTER SIX
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND JUST DESERT;
INTROD1.JCTION;
MEDIATION AND 'JUST DESERT;'
PLEA BARGAINING AND SENTENCING JUSTICE;
CRITICISM ON PLEA BARGAINING;
Plea-bargaining and Just Desert;
CHAPTER SEVEN;
VICTIMS OF CRIME AND JUST DESERT;
INTRODUCTION;
UNBALANCED TREA1MENT: ACCUSED V VICTIM;
LEGAL ANAL YSIS OF VICTIM'S PLACE UNDER ERITREA laws;
The Eritrean Constitution and the victim;
The Eritrean Penal Code and the victim;
The Eritrean criminal procedure and the victim;
Victin1s and Civil law;
What if the accused is acquitted?;
VICTIM REPARATION;
RESTITUTION;
Critic on restitution;
COMPENSATION;
Why the State should pay compensation?;
Fund from Where? FINE AND VICTIM;
MACIIINERY FOR EXECUTION COMPENSATION;
'JUST DESERT' AND TI IE VICTIM ;
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION;
BIBIOGRAPIIY.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.