TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. CHAPTER I - 1.1 Introduction;
1.2 Statement of problem ;
1.3 Research Questions ;
1.4 Hypothesis ;
1.5 Methodology ;
1.6 Chapterisation ;
2. CHAPTER II : 2.1 EXTENSION OF PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE, MADICINE UNDER IPR REGIME ;
2.2 Positive Protection ;
2.2.1 Biological Diversity Act, 2002 ;
2.2.2 The Protection of plant varieties & Farmers right Protection (PPVFR) Act 2001;
2.3 Defensive Protection ;
2.3.1 Patent Act ;
2.3.2TKDL ;
2.3.3TKRC ;
2.3.4 HONEY BEE NETWORK DATABASE ;
3. CHAPTER III : 3.1 TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE GOVERNANCE IN KARNATAKA & ITS PROGRESS ;
3.2 Karnataka Knowledge Commission ;
3.3 FRLHT ;
3.4 Department of A YUSH ;
3.5 Karnataka Paramparika Vaidya Parishath(KPVP) ;
3.6 Field work in Tumkur District ( Karnataka} ;
3.7 Traditional Knowledge in Tumkur ;
3.8 Grievience/Comments of Traditional Healers as Whole in Karnataka
4. CHAPTER IV : 4.1 ACCESS TO BENEFIT SHARING PRINCIPLE & TK HOLDERS ;
5. CHAPTER V : 5.1 SUI -GENERIS PROTECTION REGIME AND IMPLICATION OF ADOPTION IN INDIA ;
5.1.1 Meaning of Sui-Generis ;
5.1.2 Existing Sui generisModels of Selected Countries ;
5.1.2 (a) Thai Model ;
5.1.2 (b) Phillipines Model;
5.1.2(c ) The Traditional and Alternative Medicines Act (TAMA)1997 ;
5.1.2(d ) Chinese Model;
5.1.3 (e) Costa Rican Model.;
5.1.3 MODELS PROPOSED BY INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION ;
5.1.3(a) WIPO MODEL ;
5.1.3(b) OAU MODEL ;
5.1.4 Implications of WIPO MODELS AND Protection at National Level in India;
5.1.4 (a) Constitutional Protection of TMK ;
5.1.4 (b) Other Laws ;
5.1.4 (c) LATEST DEVELOPMENTS OF WIPO IN INTRODUCING SUI-GENERIS MODEL TO PROTECT
TK & ITS HOLDER'S RIGHT ;
6. CHAPTER VI: 6.1 SUGGESTIONS AND CONCLUSION ;
7. BIBLIOGRAPHY ;
8. ANNEXURE.

Generis Protection - Implementation - India Protection of Traditional Knowledge - Karnataka