000			05400nam a2200193Ia 4500
003			OSt
005			20251125134903.0
008			210518s2015 xx 000 0 und d
040			_cnls
100			_aMr. James Joseph Nedumpara
245			_aReview of the Injury and Causality Determination Standards in Trade Remedy Investigations
260			_aBangalore _bNLSIU _c2015
300			_a292p
505			_aTABLE OF CONTENTS REVIEW OF THE INJURY AND CAUSALITY DETERMINATION STANDARDS IN TRADE; REMEDY; INVESTIGATIONS; CERTIFICATE; DECLARATION; ACKNOWLEDGEMENT; ABBREVIATIONS; LIST OF CASES CITED; LEGAL INSTRUMENTS/DOCUMENTS; CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION AND RESEARCH DESIGN; A. GENERAL INTRODUCTION; B. INTRODUCTION TO THE RESEARCH PROBLEM; C. SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES OF THE RESEARCH; D. HYPOTHESIS; E. KEY RESEARCH QUESTIONS RELATING TO HYPOTHESIS; F. METHODOLOGY; G. CHAPTER OUTLINE; H. LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY; CHAPTER II: HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF INJURY AND CAUSALITY IN TRADE REMEDIES UNDER GATT/WTO; A. INTRODUCTION; B. EVOLUTION OF ANTI-DUMPING LAWS; 1. Genesis of Antidumping law; 2. Economic Rationale of Antidumping Laws; 3. Movement from Predatory Intent to Injury Standards ; C. INJURY AND CAUSATION IN ANTIDUMPING UNDER GATT 1947; 1. Antidumping under Kennedy Round; 2. Antidumping under the Tokyo Round Code; 3. Injury and Causation in Antidumping under Uruguay Round; 4. Antidumping Negotiations and the Carlisle Draft ; D. MATERIAL INJURY AND NON-ATTRIBUTION IN ANTIDUMPING INVESTIGATIONS ; 1. Causation and Non-Attribution under Uruguay Round Antidumping Agreement; 2. Causation in Sunset and Interim Reviews ; E. INJURY AND CAUSATION IN SUBSIDIES AND COUNTERVAILING INVESTIGATIONS ; 1. Injury and Causality in Tokyo Subsidies Agreement; 2. Uruguay Round Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures ; 3. Similarities of SCM Agreement and AD Agreement; F. INJURY AND CAUSATION IN SAFEGUARD INVESTIGATIONS; G. INJURY AND CAUSATION PROVISIONS AT THE END OF THE URUGUAY ROUND; H. CONCLUSION; I. ANNEXURE- 1; 1. Signatories of Kennedy Round Antidumping Code ; J. ANNEXURE- II; 1. Signatories of Tokyo Antidumping and Subsidies Codes; CHAPTER III: INJURY AND CAUSALITY IN TRADE REMEDY INVESTIGATIONS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE WTO JURISPRUDENCE; A. INTRODUCTION; B. CAUSAL LINK IN TRADE REMEDY INVESTIGATIONS: ISSUES AND CHALLENGES IN IMPLEMENTATION; 1. Concept of causal link in WTO Trade Remedy Agreements; 2. Injury and causality: Why a common approach is desirable for all trade remedy actions?; 3. Injury and Causation under the WTO: a comparison; C. ROLE OF TREND ANALYSIS; 1. Volume effects; 2. Price effects: Concept of Price Undercutting and Underselling Analysis; 3. Trends Analysis and Conceptualizing the Requirement of “Through the Effects”; 4. Summary on trend analysis; D. EXAMINATION OF THE GATT/WTO JURISPRUDENCE: THE “NON-ATTRIBUTION” TEST; 1. Identifying and Separating Other “Known Factors”; 2. Non-Attribution: Examination of the U.S Methodology in Trade remedy investigations; 3. Non-Attribution Analysis and its Discontents: The application of the ‘but-for’ test; E. CONCLUSION; F. ANNEXURE- I; CHAPTER IV: INJURY AND CAUSALITY IN ANTIDUMPING INVESTIGATIONS: EXPERIENCE OF INDIA AND OTHER JURISDICTIONS; A. INTRODUCTION; B. RISE OF ANTIDUMPING IN INDIA: LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND INSTITUTIONS; 1. India, antidumping and the Uruguay Round ; 2. Role of the DGAD and its Functioning; C. EMPIRICS OF INJURY AND CAUSATION EXAMINATION IN INDIA; 1. Examination of Volume and Price effects; 2. Lesser duty rule in India; D. SURVEY OF INJURY AND CAUSATION IN INDIAN ANTIDUMPING CASE; 1. Survey of selected Indian antidumping cases; 2. Injury and Causation: Discussion of Phase I Cases; 3. Injury and causation: Discussion of Phase-II cases; 4. Non- Attribution Analysis in Indian Antidumping Investigations; Appellate review of injury and causality in India; E. INJURY AND CAUSATION DETERMINATION: PRACTICE OF OTHER WTO MEMBERS; 1. Traditional Users; 2. Injury and Causation practices of ‘New Users’; F. CONCLUSION; G. ANNEXURES; CHAPTER V: INJURY AND CAUSALITY IN SAFEGUARDS INVESTIGATIONS: EXPERIENCE OF INDIA; A. INTRODUCTION; B. ASSESSMENT OF INJURY AND CAUSATION IN INDIA’S SAFEGUARD INVESTIGATIONS; C. NON- ATTRIBUTION ANALYSIS IN INDIA’S SAFEGUARD INVESTIGATIONS; D. CONCLUSION; H. ANNEXURES; CHAPTER VI: INJURY AND CAUSALITY IN TRADE REMEDIES: DEVELOPMENTS UNDER THE DOHA ROUND; A. INTRODUCTION; B. RULES NEGOTIATIONS AND MEMBERS’ PROPOSALS; C. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MATERIAL INJURY AND CAUSALITY; 1. Degree of Causal Relationship; D. NON-ATTRIBUTION LANGUAGE; E. NEGOTIATIONS ON SUBSIDIES AND COUNTERVAILING MEASURES; F. CONCLUSION; CHAPTER VII: GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF LAW ON CAUSALITY: APPLICATION IN THE FIELD OF TRADE REMEDY INVESTIGATIONS; A. INTRODUCTION; B. THE CONCEPT OF CAUSATION: FROM HUME TO HART AND HONORÉ; C. ADDRESSING A PLURALITY OF CAUSES IN A TRADE REMEDY SETTING; D. A CAUSATION FRAMEWORK FOR TRADE REMEDIES: NECESSITY TEST; E. CONCLUSION; CHAPTER VIII: FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS; BIBLIOGRAPHY.
520			_aAntidumping Investigation - India _aGATT - WTO - Trade Remedies _aTrade Remedies - DOHA Round
700			_aProf. (Dr.) O V Nandimath - Guide
856			_uhttps://dans.nls.ac.in/handle/123456789/519
942			_2ddc _cTH
999			_c111221 _d111221