000			01895nam a2200193Ia 4500
003			OSt
005			20240625125618.0
008			180710s2011 xx 000 0 und d
040			_cnls
100			_aVaishali Kant
245			_aPatentability of Computer Related Inventions: _bA Comparative Analysis
260			_aBangalore _bNLSIU _c2011
300			_a75p
505			_aTABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARA TION ; CERTIFICATE ; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ; TABLE OF CONTENTS ; RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ; STATEMENT OF PROBLEM ; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; HYPOTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; INTRODUCTION ; CAN WE DETERMINE THE ACTUAL NATURE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE? ; WHETHER PATENTS FOR SOFTWARE RELATED INVENTIONS ARE REALLY NECESSARY? ; ARE THERE ANY NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF SOFTWARE PATENTS AS SUCH? ; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE: A CURRENT DILLEMMA ; THE COMPUTER SOFTWARE INDUSTRY: ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS AND MARKET POSITION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE ; NEED OF IP PROTECTION TO PROMOTE INNOVATION ; Copyright Protection of Computer Software ; Computer software: a "complicated" Literary work ; Seeking protection for Functional elements of Computer Software: increasing demand ; Patent Protection of Computer Software ; Do software patents fulfill the goals of patent law?; Are Software patents beneficial to small and medium sized enterprises? ; THE CURRENT LEGAL SITUATION IN UNITED STATES, EUROPE, U.K. AND INDIA IN RELATION TO PATENTABILITY OF COMPUTER RELATED INVENTIONS ; UNITED STATES APPROACH ; EUROPEAN UNION APPROACH ; UNITED KINGDOM APPROACH ; INDIAN APPROACH ; CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS ; REFERENCES ; ANNEXURE 'A' - QUESTIONNAIRE ;
520			_aPatent - Computer Inventions _aPatent Law - India _aProtection of Computer Software
700			_aProf. (Dr.) T Ramakrishna - Guide
856			_uhttp://opac.nls.ac.in:8081/xmlui/handle/123456789/1847
942			_2ddc _cDIS
999			_c111300 _d111300