| 000 | 02054cam a2200337 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 20376560 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20260715095937.0 | ||
| 008 | 180223s2018 enk b 001 0 eng d | ||
| 010 | _a 2018935726 | ||
| 020 | _a9781784712600 (hbk.) | ||
| 035 | _a(OCoLC)on1055763956 | ||
| 040 |
_aLBRTY _beng _cLBRTY _erda _dYDX _dDLC |
||
| 042 | _alccopycat | ||
| 082 | 0 | 4 | _a340.1 SAM |
| 100 | _aSamuel, Geoffrey | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aRethinking legal reasoning / _cGeoffrey Samuel. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aCheltenham : _bEdward Elgar Publishing Limited, _c2018. |
|
| 300 |
_axvi, 386 p. ; _c24 cm. |
||
| 365 | _bRs. 9310 | ||
| 490 | 1 | _aRethinking law series | |
| 505 | 0 | _a1. General introduction; 2. What was the contribution of the medieval civilians?; 3. What was the contribution of the Roman lawyers?; 4. What was the contribution of the later civilians and the common lawyers?; 5. What is the institutional legacy?; 6. What is the legal literature legacy?; 7. How do legal reasoners treat facts?; 8. Is legal reasoning like medical reasoning?; 9. Is legal reasoning like reasoning in film studies?; 10. Is legal reasoning based on fictions? -- Can legal reasoning be rethought?; 11. Rethinking legal reasoning: should jurists take interests more seriously?; 12. Should jurists take interests more seriously (continued)?. | |
| 520 | _a"'Rethinking' legal reasoning seems a bold aim given the large amount of literature devoted to this topic. In this thought-provoking book, Geoffrey Samuel proposes a different way of approaching legal reasoning by examining the topic through the context of legal knowledge (epistemology). What is it to have knowledge of legal reasoning?" | ||
| 650 | 0 |
_aLaw _xMethodology. |
|
| 650 | 0 | _aKnowledge, Theory of. | |
| 650 | 0 | _aInformation theory in law. | |
| 830 | 0 | _aRethinking law. | |
| 906 |
_a7 _bcbc _ccopycat _d2 _eepcn _f20 _gy-gencatlg |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cBK |
||
| 999 |
_c115206 _d115206 |
||