| 000 | 02761nam a2200253Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c115796 _d115796 |
||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20210210165655.0 | ||
| 008 | 191214s9999 xx 000 0 und d | ||
| 040 | _cNLS | ||
| 100 | _aShreeja Sen | ||
| 245 | 0 | _aInvestigation into the Role of the Director General of the Competition Commission of India | |
| 260 | _aBangalore | ||
| 260 | _bNLSIU, Bangalore | ||
| 260 | _c2019 | ||
| 300 | _a87p. | ||
| 505 | _aContents Abbreviations; List 0/Illustrations ; List o/Tables ; Acknowledgements ; Chapter 1 Investigating the Investigator: The What, Why, and How; 1.1. Literature Review ; I . 1.1. Intent of Competition Law; 1.1.2. Credibility of Competition Agencies ; 1.1.3. Statutory Positioning of the Competition and DG ; 1.1.4. Inputs from Indian Courts on Role of DG; 1.1.5. Role of Commission - Adjudicatory or Administrative? ; 1.1.6. Importance of institutional Design of a Competition Enforcement Regime; 1.2. Claim or Research Problem; 1.3. Objective, Scope. and Limitations of the Study; 1.4. Research Questions; 1.5. Methodology; 1.5.1. Definitions of Terms and Phrases Used; Chapter 2 Design of the Indian Competition Act; 2.1. The Competition Commission of India; 2.2. Office of the Director General ; 2.3. Enforcement Provisions ; 2.4. Comparative International Competition Regimes ; 2.4.1. US Competition Regime ; 2.4.1.1. Relevant laws ; 2.4.1.2. Institutions ; 2.4.2. EU Competition Regime ; 2.4.2.1. Relevant laws ; 2.4.2.1. Institutions ; 2.4.3. Japan's Competition Regime ; 2.4.3.1. Relevant laws ; 2.4.3.2. Institutions ; Chapter 3 Commission's Thoughts on the DG: Deep-dive into Orders ; 3.1. Orders under Section 26(6) ; 3.2. Orders under Section 27 ; Chapter 4 Probing the Commission's Orders ; 4.1. Method and Analysis ; 4.2. On Evidence ; 4.3. Final Decisions ; 4.4. On Causality and Procedure ; Chapter 5 Insights into an Institution: What the Analysis Reveals ; 5.1 Answering Research Questions ; 5.1.1. On the Commission's View of the DO Reports ; 5.1.2. On Reasons for Accepting or Rejecting the DO's Reports 5.1.3. On Trends that Emerge from the Reasons given by the Commission 5.1.3.1. On Sufficiency of Evidence ; 5.2. On Policy Concerns ; Chapter 6 Towards a Robust Commission ; Appendices; I Data Collection Matrix on Commission Orders; II Qualitative Content Analysis on Extracted Commission Orders ; References and Bibliography; Court Cases. | ||
| 650 | _aCompetition commission | ||
| 650 | _aDirector general | ||
| 650 | _aInquisitoral body | ||
| 650 | _aLegal certainty | ||
| 700 | _aProf. Rahul Singh – Guide | ||
| 856 | _uhttp://opac.nls.ac.in:8081/xmlui/handle/123456789/280 | ||
| 942 |
_cDIS _2ddc |
||