| 000 | 02958nam a2200181Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c207664 _d207664 |
||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20210217160050.0 | ||
| 008 | 210206s2020 xx 000 0 und | ||
| 040 | _cnls | ||
| 100 | _aAditya Pratap Singh | ||
| 245 | 4 | _aThe Determination of the Centre of Main Interest in the Cross Border Insolvency and Intricacies Appurtenant to it | |
| 260 |
_aBangalore _bNLSIU _c2020 |
||
| 300 | _a69p. | ||
| 505 | _aTABLE OF CONTENT 1. CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION; 1.1 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM; 1.2 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY; 1.3 HYPOTHESIS; 1.4 RESEARCH QUESTIONS; 1.5 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY; 1.6 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY; 1.7 SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS; 1.8 MODE OF CITATION; 1.9 SCHEME OF STUDY: CHAPTER IZATION; 2. CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF LITEATURE; 3. CHAPTER 3: EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPT OF INSOLVENCY AND CROSS BORDER INSOLVENCY; 3.1 HISTORY AND EVOLUTION OF INSOLVENCY LAW; 3.2 INDIAN SCENARIO; 3.3 EMERGENCE OF THE CONCEPT OF CROSS BORDER INSOLVENCY AND VIS-À-VIS INIDAN SCENARIO; 3.4 CRITICAL ANALYSIS; 4. CHAPTER 4: CROSS BORDER INSOLVENCY: A THEORITICAL PERSPECTIVE; 4.1 UNIVERSALISM; 4.2 TERRITORIALISM; 4.3 MODIFIED UNIVERSALISM; 4.4 CO-OPERATIVE TERRITORIALITY; 4.5 CONTRACTUALISM; 4.6 CRITICAL ANALYSIS; 5. CHAPTER 5: CENTRE OF MAIN INTEREST: CONCEPT AND POSITION UNDER EU- REGULATION; 5.1 WHAT IS CENTRE OF MAIN INTEREST (CoMI); 5.2 DISCUSSION ON EU REGULATION ON CROSS BORDER INSOLVENCY, 2000 VIS-À-VIS DETERMINATION OF COMI; 5.3 CASE ANALYSIS OF EUROFOOD –IFCS CASE; 5.3.1 FACTS OF THE CASE; 5.3.2 RULING OF DUBLIN HIGH COURT IN RELATION TO DETERMINATION OF CoMI; 5.3.3 RULING OF THE IRISH SUPREME COURT ON AN APPEAL BY MR. BONDI; 5.3.4 REFERENCE TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE WITH A BRIEF ACCOUNT OF JURISDICTIONAL POWER OF THE ECJ AND ITS BINDING NATURE ON THE PARTIES; 5.3.4.1 JURISDICTION OF ECJ; 5.3.4.2 EXTENT OF BINDING NATURE OF THE DECISION GIVEN BY ECJ; 5.3.5 DECISION OF THE ECJ; 5.4 LATER DEVELOPMENT IN THE EU REGULATION VIS-A- VIS CENTRE OF MAIN INTEREST; 5.4.1 EU REGULATION, 2015; 5.5 RECENT DEVELOPMENT; 5.6CRITICAL ANALYSIS; 6. CHAPTER 6: CENTRE OF MAIN INTEREST: UNICTRAL MODEL LAW VIS-A- VIS POSITION UNDER UNITED STATES; 6.1 INTRODUCTION; 6.2 CENTRE OF MAIN INTERST; 6.2.1 CONFLICT OF OPINION AMONG COURTS IN US FOR DETERMINING CoMI; 6.3 CRITICAL ANALYSIS; 7. CHAPTER 7: INDIAN PERSPECTIVE RELATING TO CROSS BORDER INSOLVENCY AND CENTRE OF MAIN INTERESTS; 7.1 DISCUSSION ON CROSS BORDER INSOLVENCY AND COMI IN JET AIRWAYS CASE; 7.2 CRITICAL ANALYSIS; 8. CHAPTER 8: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS; 8.1 CONCLUSION; 8.2 SUGGESTION; 8.2.1 IN RELATION TO AVOIDANCE OF FORUM SHOPPING AND INCREAING THE EFFICIENCY OF LAWS; 8.2.2 IN RELATION TO PROCEDURAL ASPECTS; 8.2.3 CoMI OF CORPORATE GROUPS; 9. BIBLIOGRAPHY. | ||
| 700 | _aProf. (Dr.) O. V. Nandimath - Guide | ||
| 856 | _uhttp://opac.nls.ac.in:8081/xmlui/handle/123456789/393 | ||
| 942 |
_cDIS _2ddc |
||