| 000 | 03478cam a2200445 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 18244123 | ||
| 005 | 20251229094752.0 | ||
| 008 | 140728s2015 enk b 001 0 eng | ||
| 010 | _a 2014029908 | ||
| 020 |
_a9781107092686 _qhardback |
||
| 035 | _a18244123 | ||
| 040 |
_aDLC _beng _cDLC _erda _dDLC |
||
| 041 |
_aeng _hger |
||
| 042 | _apcc | ||
| 043 | _ae-gx--- | ||
| 082 | 0 | 0 |
_a342.001 _223 |
| 245 | 0 | 4 |
_aThe guardian of the constitution : _bHans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the limits of constitutional law / _ctranslation, introduction, and notes by Lars Vinx. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aUnited Kingdom : _bCambridge University Press, _c2015. |
|
| 300 |
_aix, 279 pages ; _c24 cm. |
||
| 336 |
_atext _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_aunmediated _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_avolume _2rdacarrier |
||
| 365 | _bRs. 12648.00 | ||
| 490 | 0 | _aCambridge studies in constitutional law | |
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 266-273) and index. | ||
| 505 | 8 | _aMachine generated contents note: Introduction; 1. Kelsen on the nature and development of constitutional adjudication; 2. The guardian of the constitution: Schmitt's argument against judicial review; 3. The guardian of the constitution: Schmitt on the President as guardian of the constitution; 4. Who ought to be the guardian of the constitution? Kelsen's reply to Schmitt; 5. Prussia contra Reich: Schmitt's closing statement in Leipzig; 6. Kelsen on the judgment of the Staatsgerichtshof of the 25th of October 1932. | |
| 520 |
_a"This volume provides the first English translation of Hans Kelsen's and Carl Schmitt's influential Weimar-era debate on constitutional guardianship and the legitimacy of constitutional review. It includes Kelsen's seminal piece, 'The Nature and Development of Constitutional Adjudication', as well as key extracts from the 'Guardian of the Constitution' which present Schmitt's argument against constitutional review. Also included are Kelsen's review of Schmitt's 'Guardian of the Constitution', as well as some further material by Kelsen and Schmitt on presidential dictatorship under Article 48 of the Weimar Constitution. These texts show Kelsen and Schmitt responding to one another, in the context of a debate focused on a concrete constitutional crisis, thus allowing the reader to assess the plausibility of Kelsen's and Schmitt's legal and constitutional theories"-- _cProvided by publisher. |
||
| 520 |
_a"The aim of this series is to produce leading monographs in constitutional law. All areas of constitutional law and public law fall within the ambit of the series, including human rights and civil liberties law, administrative law, as well as constitutional theory and the history of constitutional law. A wide variety of scholarly approaches is encouraged, with the governing criterion being simply that the work is of interest to an international audience"-- _cProvided by publisher. |
||
| 600 | 1 | 0 |
_aKelsen, Hans, _d1881-1973 _xCorrespondence. |
| 600 | 1 | 0 |
_aSchmitt, Carl, _d1888-1985 _xCorrespondence. |
| 650 | 0 |
_aConstitutional law _xPhilosophy. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aExecutive power _zGermany. |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aLAW / Constitutional. _2bisacsh |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aKelsen, Hans, _d1881-1973. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aSchmitt, Carl, _d1888-1985. |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aVinx, Lars, _eeditor _etranslator. |
|
| 906 |
_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cBK |
||
| 999 |
_c214182 _d214182 |
||