| 000 | 01748nam a2200145Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20260209120130.0 | ||
| 008 | 260209s9999||||xx |||||||||||||| ||und|| | ||
| 100 | _aVaishali Kant | ||
| 245 | 0 | _aPatentability of computer related inventions : a comparative analysis | |
| 260 |
_aBangaloreBangalore _bNLSIU _c2011 |
||
| 300 | _a75 p. ; 25 cm. | ||
| 505 | _aTABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARA TION ; CERTIFICATE ; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ; TABLE OF CONTENTS ; RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ; STATEMENT OF PROBLEM ; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; HYPOTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; INTRODUCTION ; CAN WE DETERMINE THE ACTUAL NATURE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE? ; WHETHER PATENTS FOR SOFTWARE RELATED INVENTIONS ARE REALLY NECESSARY? ; ARE THERE ANY NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF SOFTWARE PATENTS AS SUCH? ; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE: A CURRENT DILLEMMA ; THE COMPUTER SOFTWARE INDUSTRY: ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS AND MARKET POSITION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE ; NEED OF IP PROTECTION TO PROMOTE INNOVATION ; Copyright Protection of Computer Software ; Computer software: a "complicated" Literary work ; Seeking protection for Functional elements of Computer Software: increasing demand ; Patent Protection of Computer Software ; Do software patents fulfill the goals of patent law?; Are Software patents beneficial to small and medium sized enterprises? ; THE CURRENT LEGAL SITUATION IN UNITED STATES, EUROPE, U.K. AND INDIA IN RELATION TO PATENTABILITY OF COMPUTER RELATED INVENTIONS ; UNITED STATES APPROACH ; EUROPEAN UNION APPROACH ; UNITED KINGDOM APPROACH ; INDIAN APPROACH ; CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS ; REFERENCES ; ANNEXURE 'A' - QUESTIONNAIRE ; | ||
| 700 | _aProf. (Dr.) T Ramakrishna - GuideProf. (Dr.) T Ramakrishna - Guide | ||
| 856 | _uhttps://dans.nls.ac.in/handle/123456789/1847 | ||
| 999 |
_c217001 _d217001 |
||