000			02847nam a22003015i 4500
001			23939868
005			20260325114059.0
008			241204s2025 nyu 000 0 eng
010			_a 2024951417
020			_a9780198863540 _q(hardback)
035			_a23939868
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC
042			_apcc
082			_a342.6 DAI
100	1		_aDaintith, Terence, _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aExecutive self-government and the constitution / _cTerence Daintith, Alan Page.
250			_a1.
264		1	_aNew York : _bOxford University Press, _c2025.
300			_avii, 446 pages. _c24 cm.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
365			_bRs. 15531.00
505			_aPART A. INTRODUCTION: 1:The Executive in the Constitution: Forces for Change 1997-2024 - PART B. THE STRUCTURE OF THE EXECUTIVE: 2:The Centre of Government: Bigger and Stronger? Or Just Bigger? - 3:The Ministerial Department: Making and Breaking, Structuring, Steering - 4:Public Bodies: Creation, Culling, Classification, and Patronage - 5:Devolution: From 'Devolve and Forget' to 'Protect and Respect' - PART C. THE RESOURCES OF THE EXECUTIVE: PEOPLE: 6:The Civil Service: The Continuing Failure of Reform - PART D. THE RESOURCES OF THE EXECUTIVE: MONEY: 7:Fiscal Responsibility and Expenditure Planning and Control - 8:Spending Responsibly: Expenditure Principles and Treasury Control - PART E. THE RESOURCES OF THE EXECUTIVE: LAW: 9:How Government Lawyers Advise Ministers and Manage Prosecutions - 10: Shaping Legislation, Exploiting Delegated Legislation, Reining in Regulation - PART F. THE RESOURCES OF THE EXECUTIVE: INFORMATION: 11:Government Information: Privileges, Constraints, and Obligations - 12:Government Communications: Persuasion with Propriety - PART G. CONCLUSION: 13:The Impact of 21st-Century Challenges - Bibliography - Index.
520			_a"These statements, the first from the website of Parliament itself, present a constitutional characterisation of the executive that is very different from the one traditionally offered by most United Kingdom constitutional law writing. The emphasis in that literature on parliamentary sovereignty as the supreme, if not the only, constitutional tenet, on the lack of any limit on Parliament's power to empower or restrain executive action through legislation, and on the subjection of the executive to control by the courts, made it difficult to see the executive as a distinctive 'power' under the constitution at all, and led a senior judge to remark (albeit extra-judicially) that 'the executive cannot be one of three sovereign and equal elements of the State"-- _cProvided by publisher.
700	1		_aPage, Alan, _eauthor.
906			_a0 _bibc _corignew _d2 _eepcn _f20 _gy-gencatlg
942			_2ddc _cBK
999			_c217883 _d217883