| 000 | 03587nam a2200217Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c22279 _d22279 |
||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20201209162557.0 | ||
| 008 | 160316s2005 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 020 | _a9781843762799 | ||
| 040 | _cnls | ||
| 082 |
_a341.754000 _bAND-II |
||
| 100 | _aAnderson Kym | ||
| 245 | _aThe WTO and Agriculture Vol. II | ||
| 260 |
_aLondon _bAn Elgar Referemcer Collection _c2005 |
||
| 300 |
_a523p _cxi |
||
| 365 | _bRs.23,540 Vols | ||
| 505 | _aContents – Volume II – Acknowledgements; An introduction by the editors to both volumes appears in Volume I; PART I THE URUGUAY ROUND AGREEMENT ON AGRICULTURE; 1. Dale E. Hathaway and Merlinda D. Ingco (1996), ‘Agricultural Liberalization and the Uruguay Round’; 2. William D. Coleman and Stefan Tangermann (1999), ‘The 1992 CAP Reform, the Uruguay Round and the Commission: Conceptualizing Linked Policy Games’; 3. Richard A. Higgott and Andrew Fenton Cooper (1990), ‘Middle Power Leadership and Coalition Building: Australia, the Cairns Group, and the Uruguay Round of Trade Negotiations’; 4. Kym Anderson (2001), ‘Bringing Discipline to Agricultural Policy via the WTO’; 5. Stefan Tangermann (2002), ‘Agriculture on the Way to Firm International Trading Rules’; PART II THE URUGUAY ROUND AGREEMENT ON SANITARY AND PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES; 6. Donna Roberts (1998), ‘Preliminary Assessment of the Effects of the WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Trade Regulations’; 7. Richard H. Snape and David Orden (2001), ‘Integrating Import Risk and Trade Benefit Analysis’; 8. Sallie James and Kym Anderson (1998), ‘On the Need for More Economic Assessment of Quarantine Policies’; PART III GATT/WTO AGRICULTURAL TRADE DISPUTE RESOLUTION; 9. Louis L. Snyder (1945), ‘The American-German Pork Dispute, 1879–1891’; 10. T. Josling and S. Tangermann (2003), ‘Production and Export Subsidies in Agriculture: Lessons from GATT and WTO Disputes Involving the US and the EC’; 11. Jean-Christophe Bureau, Stephan Marette and Alessandra Schiavina (1998), ‘Non-tariff Trade Barriers and Consumers' Information: The Case of the EU-US Trade Dispute over Beef’; 12. Tim Josling (2003), ‘Bananas and the WTO: Testing the New Dispute Settlement Process’; PART IV NEW NEGOTIATIONS AND “NEW” ISSUES FOR AGRICULTURE; 13. Stefan Tangermann and Tim Josling (2001), ‘Issues in the Next Round of WTO Agricultural Negotiations’; 14. Philip L. Paarlberg, Maury Bredahl and John G. Lee (2002), ‘Multifunctionality and Agricultural Trade Negotiations’; 15. Kym Anderson (1992), ‘Agricultural Trade Liberalisation and the Environment: A Global Perspective’; 16. Neil McCulloch, L. Alan Winters and Xavier Cirera (2001), ‘Agricultural Trade Reform’; 17. Grant E. Isaac and William A. Kerr (2003), ‘Genetically Modified Organisms and Trade Rules: Identifying Important Challenges for the WTO’; 18. David Blandford, Jean-Christophe Bureau, Linda Fulponi and Spencer Henson (2002), ‘Potential Implications of Animal Welfare Concerns and Public Policies in Industrialized Countries for International Trade’; 19. Peter Holmes and Robert Read (2001), ‘Competition Policy, Agriculture and the WTO’; 20. Tim Josling (1997), State Trading: The Achilles Heel of the WTO? Index | ||
| 650 | _a1. World Trade Organization2. General Agreement on Tariffs & Trade Organization3. Uruguay Round -1987-1994)4. Produce Trade - Government Policy - International cooperation5. Agriculture - Economic Aspects | ||
| 700 |
_aJosling Tim _a |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cBK |
||