000			04112nam a2200217Ia 4500
999			_c31492 _d31492
003			OSt
005			20210106162821.0
008			160316s2012 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_a9781848449756
040			_cNLS
082			_a341.77 _bSCH-III
100			_aSchabas William A
245			_aInternational criminal law Vol. III
260			_aLondon _bEdward Elgar _c2012
300			_a901p _cix
365			_bRs. 69,686 Vol
505			_aContents: Volume-III; Acknowledgments; An introduction to all three volumes by the editor appears in Volume I; PART-I-THE AD HOC AND ‘HYBRID’ TRIBUNALS, AND NATIONAL SYSTEMS; 1. M. Cherif Bassiouni (1994), ‘The Commission of Experts Established pursuant to Security Council Resolution 780: Investigating Violations of International Humanitarian Law in the Former Yugoslavia’; 2. Patricia M. Wald (2001), ‘The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Comes of Age: Some Observations on Day-to-Day Dilemmas of an International Court’; 3. Daryl A. Mundis (2005), ‘The Judicial Effects of the “Completion Strategies” on the Ad Hoc International Criminal Tribunals’; 4. David Wippman (2006), ‘The Costs of International Justice’; 5. Mirko Klarin (2004), ‘The Tribunal’s Four Battles’; 6. William A. Schabas (2009), ‘Anti-Complementarity: Referral to National Jurisdictions by the UN International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda’; 7. Laura A. Dickinson (2003), ‘The Promise of Hybrid Courts’; 8. Mark S. Ellis (2004), ‘Coming to Terms with its Past – Serbia’s New Court for the Prosecution of War Crimes’; 9. Leila Sadat Wexler (1994), ‘The Interpretation of the Nuremberg Principles by the French Court of Cassation: From Touvier to Barbie and Back Again’; PART-II-THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT; 10. Olympia Bekou and Robert Cryer (2007), ‘The International Criminal Court and Universal Jurisdiction: A Close Encounter?’; 11. William W. Burke-White (2008), ‘Proactive Complementarity: The International Criminal Court and National Courts in the Rome System of International Justice’; 12. Andrew T. Cayley (2008), ‘The Prosecutor’s Strategy in Seeking the Arrest of Sudanese President Al Bashir on Charges of Genocide’; 13. Allison Marston Danner (2003), ‘Enhancing the Legitimacy and Accountability of Prosecutorial Discretion at the International Criminal Court’; 14. Margaret M. deGuzman (2009), ‘Gravity and the Legitimacy of the International Criminal Court’; 15. Mohamed El Zeidy (2002), ‘The United States Dropped the Atomic Bomb of Article 16 of the ICC Statute: Security Council Power of Deferrals and Resolution 1422’; 16. Silvia A. Fernández de Gurmendi and Håkan Friman (2000), ‘The Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Court’; 17. Valerie Oosterveld, Mike Perry and John McManus (2002), ‘The Cooperation of States with the International Criminal Court’; 18. Sienho Yee (1996), ‘A Proposal to Reformulate Article 23 of the ILC Draft Statute for an International Criminal Court’; 19. David J. Scheffer (2001), ‘A Negotiator’s Perspective on the International Criminal Court’; 20. William A. Schabas (2000), ‘Life, Death and the Crime of Crimes: Supreme Penalties and the ICC Statute’; 21. Ray Murphy (2006), ‘Gravity Issues and the International Criminal Court’; 22. Rod Rastan (2008), ‘What is a “Case” for the Purpose of the Rome Statute?’; 23. Nicolaos Strapatsas (2002), ‘Universal Jurisdiction and the International Criminal Court’; 24. Carsten Stahn (2005), ‘Complementarity, Amnesties and Alternative Forms of Justice: Some Interpretative Guidelines for the International Criminal Court’; 25. Carsten Stahn, Mohamed M. El Zeidy and Héctor Olásolo (2005), ‘The International Criminal Court’s Ad hoc Jurisdiction Revisited’; 26. M. Cherif Bassiouni (2010), ‘Perspectives on International Criminal Justice’.
650			_a1. Internaitonal Criminal Courts2. International Offences 3. International Criminal Law
700			_a _a
942			_2ddc _cBK