Formatted contents note |
Table of Contents<br/>Volume I: INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND ITS CONTEXT<br/>Part 1: The Notion Of International Criminal Law<br/>1. G. Schwarzenberger, ‘The Problem of an International Criminal Law’, Current Legal Problems (1950), 265.<br/>2. I. Tallgren, ‘The Sensibility and Sense of International Criminal Law’, 13 EJIL (2002), 575.<br/>3. N. Boister, ‘Transnational Criminal Law?’, 14 EJIL (2003), 953.<br/>Part 2: Purpose and Function of International Criminal Law<br/>4. M. R. Damaska, ‘What is the Point of International Criminal Justice?’, 83 Chicago-Kent Law Review (2008), 329–65.<br/>5. A. Cassese, ‘The Rationale of International Criminal Justice’, in Cassese (ed.), Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (Oxford University Press, 2009), p. 123.<br/>6. M. Osiel, ‘Why Prosecute? Critics of Punishment for Mass Atrocity’, 22 Human Rights Quarterly (2000), 118.<br/>7. M. Koskenniemi, ‘Between Impunity and Show Trials’, in Frowein and Wolfrum (eds.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 6 (2002), 1<br/>8. J. N. Clark, ‘The Limits of Retributive Justice: Findings of an Empirical Study in Bosnia and Herzegovina’, 7 JICJ (2009), 463–87.<br/>Part 3: The Historical Evolution of International Criminal Law<br/>9. T. L. H. McCormack, ‘From Sun Tzu to the Sixth Committee: The Evolution of an International Criminal Law Regime’, The Law of War Crimes: National and International Approaches (Kluwer Law International, 1997), pp. 31–63.<br/>10. Q. Wright, ‘The Law of the Nuremberg Trial’, 41(1) AJIL (1947), 38–72.<br/>11. Telford Taylor, ‘The Nuremberg Trials’, 55 Columbia Law Review (1955), 488–525.<br/>12. C. Tomuschat, ‘The Legacy of Nuremberg’, 4 JICJ (2006), 830–44.<br/>13. K. J. Heller, ‘Legacy’, The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law (Oxford, 2011), pp. 369–97.<br/>14. R. Cryer, Introduction, in Boister et al. (eds.), Documents on the Tokyo International Military Tribunal (Oxford, 2008).<br/>15. B. Röling, ‘The Nuremberg and Tokyo Trials in Retrospect’, in Bassiouni and Nanda (eds.), A Treatise on International Criminal Law (Charles C. Thomas, 1973).<br/>Part 4: Humanitarian Law, Human Rights Law—And International Criminal Law<br/>16. J. R. Dugard, ‘Bridging the Gap Between Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: The Punishment of Offenders’, 38 Intl’ Review of the Red Cross (1998), 445–53.<br/>17. J. Mendez, ‘International Human Rights Law, International Humanitarian Law, and International Criminal Law and Procedure: New Relationships’, in D. Shelton (ed.), International Crimes, Peace, and Human Rights: The Role of the International Criminal Court (Transnational, 2000), p. 65.<br/>18. K. Anderson, ‘The Rise of International Criminal Law: Intended and Unintended Consequences’, 20 EJIL (2009), 331–58.<br/>19. W. Schabas, ‘Synergy or Fragmentation? International Criminal Law and the European Convention on Human Rights’, 9 JICJ (2011), 959–72.<br/>Part 5: Public Opinion, the Media—And International Criminal Justice<br/>20. M. Simons, ‘International Criminal Tribunals and the Media’, 7 JICJ (2009), 83–8.<br/>21. M. Klarin, ‘The Impact of the ICTY Trials on Public Opinion in the Former Yugoslavia’, 7 JICJ (2009), 89–96.<br/>22. K. C. Moghalu, ‘Image and Reality of War Crimes Justice: External Perceptions of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda’, 26 The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs (2002), 21–46. |