International criminal law : Critical concepts in law Vol. I International criminal justice and its context

By:

Cassese Antonio

Contributor(s):

JeBberger Florian Cryer Robert

Publication details: London Routledge 2015Description: 601p xxviiISBN:

9780415603188

Subject(s):

1. International Criminal Law - Jurisdiction2. International Crimes

DDC classification:

341.770000 CAS-I

Contents:

Table of Contents Volume I: INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND ITS CONTEXT Part 1: The Notion Of International Criminal Law 1. G. Schwarzenberger, ‘The Problem of an International Criminal Law’, Current Legal Problems (1950), 265. 2. I. Tallgren, ‘The Sensibility and Sense of International Criminal Law’, 13 EJIL (2002), 575. 3. N. Boister, ‘Transnational Criminal Law?’, 14 EJIL (2003), 953. Part 2: Purpose and Function of International Criminal Law 4. M. R. Damaska, ‘What is the Point of International Criminal Justice?’, 83 Chicago-Kent Law Review (2008), 329–65. 5. A. Cassese, ‘The Rationale of International Criminal Justice’, in Cassese (ed.), Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (Oxford University Press, 2009), p. 123. 6. M. Osiel, ‘Why Prosecute? Critics of Punishment for Mass Atrocity’, 22 Human Rights Quarterly (2000), 118. 7. M. Koskenniemi, ‘Between Impunity and Show Trials’, in Frowein and Wolfrum (eds.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 6 (2002), 1 8. J. N. Clark, ‘The Limits of Retributive Justice: Findings of an Empirical Study in Bosnia and Herzegovina’, 7 JICJ (2009), 463–87. Part 3: The Historical Evolution of International Criminal Law 9. T. L. H. McCormack, ‘From Sun Tzu to the Sixth Committee: The Evolution of an International Criminal Law Regime’, The Law of War Crimes: National and International Approaches (Kluwer Law International, 1997), pp. 31–63. 10. Q. Wright, ‘The Law of the Nuremberg Trial’, 41(1) AJIL (1947), 38–72. 11. Telford Taylor, ‘The Nuremberg Trials’, 55 Columbia Law Review (1955), 488–525. 12. C. Tomuschat, ‘The Legacy of Nuremberg’, 4 JICJ (2006), 830–44. 13. K. J. Heller, ‘Legacy’, The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law (Oxford, 2011), pp. 369–97. 14. R. Cryer, Introduction, in Boister et al. (eds.), Documents on the Tokyo International Military Tribunal (Oxford, 2008). 15. B. Röling, ‘The Nuremberg and Tokyo Trials in Retrospect’, in Bassiouni and Nanda (eds.), A Treatise on International Criminal Law (Charles C. Thomas, 1973). Part 4: Humanitarian Law, Human Rights Law—And International Criminal Law 16. J. R. Dugard, ‘Bridging the Gap Between Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: The Punishment of Offenders’, 38 Intl’ Review of the Red Cross (1998), 445–53. 17. J. Mendez, ‘International Human Rights Law, International Humanitarian Law, and International Criminal Law and Procedure: New Relationships’, in D. Shelton (ed.), International Crimes, Peace, and Human Rights: The Role of the International Criminal Court (Transnational, 2000), p. 65. 18. K. Anderson, ‘The Rise of International Criminal Law: Intended and Unintended Consequences’, 20 EJIL (2009), 331–58. 19. W. Schabas, ‘Synergy or Fragmentation? International Criminal Law and the European Convention on Human Rights’, 9 JICJ (2011), 959–72. Part 5: Public Opinion, the Media—And International Criminal Justice 20. M. Simons, ‘International Criminal Tribunals and the Media’, 7 JICJ (2009), 83–8. 21. M. Klarin, ‘The Impact of the ICTY Trials on Public Opinion in the Former Yugoslavia’, 7 JICJ (2009), 89–96. 22. K. C. Moghalu, ‘Image and Reality of War Crimes Justice: External Perceptions of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda’, 26 The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs (2002), 21–46.

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Shelving location	Call number	Status	Notes	Date due	Barcode
BOOKs	National Law School	REFERENCE SECTION	341.77 CAS-I (Browse shelf(Opens below))	Not For Loan	Price for the entire Set of Volumes		33806

Table of Contents
Volume I: INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND ITS CONTEXT
Part 1: The Notion Of International Criminal Law
1. G. Schwarzenberger, ‘The Problem of an International Criminal Law’, Current Legal Problems (1950), 265.
2. I. Tallgren, ‘The Sensibility and Sense of International Criminal Law’, 13 EJIL (2002), 575.
3. N. Boister, ‘Transnational Criminal Law?’, 14 EJIL (2003), 953.
Part 2: Purpose and Function of International Criminal Law
4. M. R. Damaska, ‘What is the Point of International Criminal Justice?’, 83 Chicago-Kent Law Review (2008), 329–65.
5. A. Cassese, ‘The Rationale of International Criminal Justice’, in Cassese (ed.), Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (Oxford University Press, 2009), p. 123.
6. M. Osiel, ‘Why Prosecute? Critics of Punishment for Mass Atrocity’, 22 Human Rights Quarterly (2000), 118.
7. M. Koskenniemi, ‘Between Impunity and Show Trials’, in Frowein and Wolfrum (eds.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 6 (2002), 1
8. J. N. Clark, ‘The Limits of Retributive Justice: Findings of an Empirical Study in Bosnia and Herzegovina’, 7 JICJ (2009), 463–87.
Part 3: The Historical Evolution of International Criminal Law
9. T. L. H. McCormack, ‘From Sun Tzu to the Sixth Committee: The Evolution of an International Criminal Law Regime’, The Law of War Crimes: National and International Approaches (Kluwer Law International, 1997), pp. 31–63.
10. Q. Wright, ‘The Law of the Nuremberg Trial’, 41(1) AJIL (1947), 38–72.
11. Telford Taylor, ‘The Nuremberg Trials’, 55 Columbia Law Review (1955), 488–525.
12. C. Tomuschat, ‘The Legacy of Nuremberg’, 4 JICJ (2006), 830–44.
13. K. J. Heller, ‘Legacy’, The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law (Oxford, 2011), pp. 369–97.
14. R. Cryer, Introduction, in Boister et al. (eds.), Documents on the Tokyo International Military Tribunal (Oxford, 2008).
15. B. Röling, ‘The Nuremberg and Tokyo Trials in Retrospect’, in Bassiouni and Nanda (eds.), A Treatise on International Criminal Law (Charles C. Thomas, 1973).
Part 4: Humanitarian Law, Human Rights Law—And International Criminal Law
16. J. R. Dugard, ‘Bridging the Gap Between Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: The Punishment of Offenders’, 38 Intl’ Review of the Red Cross (1998), 445–53.
17. J. Mendez, ‘International Human Rights Law, International Humanitarian Law, and International Criminal Law and Procedure: New Relationships’, in D. Shelton (ed.), International Crimes, Peace, and Human Rights: The Role of the International Criminal Court (Transnational, 2000), p. 65.
18. K. Anderson, ‘The Rise of International Criminal Law: Intended and Unintended Consequences’, 20 EJIL (2009), 331–58.
19. W. Schabas, ‘Synergy or Fragmentation? International Criminal Law and the European Convention on Human Rights’, 9 JICJ (2011), 959–72.
Part 5: Public Opinion, the Media—And International Criminal Justice
20. M. Simons, ‘International Criminal Tribunals and the Media’, 7 JICJ (2009), 83–8.
21. M. Klarin, ‘The Impact of the ICTY Trials on Public Opinion in the Former Yugoslavia’, 7 JICJ (2009), 89–96.
22. K. C. Moghalu, ‘Image and Reality of War Crimes Justice: External Perceptions of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda’, 26 The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs (2002), 21–46.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.