NLSUI OPAC header image
Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Intellectual property and biotechnology

By: Contributor(s):
Publication details: London Edward Elgar 2011Description: 561p xxiISBN:
  • 9781848442610
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 346.048000 RAI
Contents:
Table of contents Acknowledgements Introduction Arti K. Rai; PART I THE LAW AND ECONOMICS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY PATENTS: FIRST PRINCIPLESl A. Foundational Technologiesl 1. Edmund W. Kitch (1977), 'The Nature and Function of the Patent System'; 2. Robert P. Merges and Richard R. Nelson (1990), 'On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope'; B. Anti-commons; 3. Michael A. Heller and Rebecca S. Eisenberg (1998), 'Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anti Commons in Biomedical Research'; 4. John P. Walsh, Ashish Arora and Wesley M. Cohen (2003), 'Working Through the Patent Problem'; 5. Fiona Murray and Scott Stern (2007), 'Do Formal Intellectual Property Rights Hinder the Free Flow of Scientific Knowledge? An Empirical Test of the Anti-commons Hypothesis'; 6. Chris Holman (2006) 'Clearing a Path Through the Patent Thicket'; C. Patents and Industrial Organization; 7. Ashish Arora and Robert P. Merges (2004), 'Specialised Supply Firms, Property Rights and Firm Boundaries'; PART II ADDRESSING TRANSACTION COSTS: THE ROLE OF THE UTILITY REQUIREMENT; 8. John M. Golden (2001), 'Biotechnology, Technology Policy, and Patentability: Natural Products and Invention in the American System'; PART III THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS: BIOTECHNOLOGY PATENTS AND THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 9. Arti K. Rai (1999), 'Intellectual Property Rights in Biotechnology: Addressing New Technology'; 10. Dan L. Burk and Mark A. Lemley (2002), 'Is Patent Law Technology-Specific?'; PART IV PATENTABLE SUBJECT MATTER; 11. Kevin Emerson Collins (2007), 'Propertizing Thought'; PART V EXPERIMENTAL USE; 12. Janice M. Mueller (2001), 'No ''Dilettante Affair'': Rethinking the Experimental Use Exception to Patent Infringement for Biomedical Research Tools'; PART VI THE ROLE OF SECRECY AND PHYSICAL EXCLUDABILITY; 13. John P. Walsh, Wesley M. Cohen and Charlene Cho (2007), 'Where Excludability Matters: Material Versus Intellectual Property in Academic Biomedical Research'; PART VII COMMERCIALIZATION OF PUBLICLY FUNDED RESEARCH; 14. Richard Jensen and Marie Thursby (2001), 'Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions'; 15. Arti K. Rai and Rebecca S. Eisenberg (2003), 'Bayh-Dole Reform and the Progress of Biomedicine'; PART VIII INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND CONSUMER ACCESS; 16. Robert Cook-Deegan, Subhashini Chandrasekharan and Misha Angrist (2009), 'The Dangers of Diagnostic Monopolies'; 17. Henry G. Grabowski, David B. Ridley and Kevin A. Schulman (2007), 'Entry and Competition in Generic Biologics'; Name Index;
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Shelving location Call number Status Date due Barcode
BOOKs BOOKs National Law School CIPRA Section 346.048 RAI (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not For Loan 30477

Table of contents
Acknowledgements Introduction Arti K. Rai;

PART I THE LAW AND ECONOMICS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY PATENTS: FIRST PRINCIPLESl
A. Foundational Technologiesl
1. Edmund W. Kitch (1977), 'The Nature and Function of the Patent System';
2. Robert P. Merges and Richard R. Nelson (1990), 'On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope';
B. Anti-commons;
3. Michael A. Heller and Rebecca S. Eisenberg (1998), 'Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anti Commons in Biomedical Research';
4. John P. Walsh, Ashish Arora and Wesley M. Cohen (2003), 'Working Through the Patent Problem';
5. Fiona Murray and Scott Stern (2007), 'Do Formal Intellectual Property Rights Hinder the Free Flow of Scientific Knowledge? An Empirical Test of the Anti-commons Hypothesis';
6. Chris Holman (2006) 'Clearing a Path Through the Patent Thicket';
C. Patents and Industrial Organization;
7. Ashish Arora and Robert P. Merges (2004), 'Specialised Supply Firms, Property Rights and Firm Boundaries';
PART II ADDRESSING TRANSACTION COSTS: THE ROLE OF THE UTILITY REQUIREMENT;
8. John M. Golden (2001), 'Biotechnology, Technology Policy, and Patentability: Natural Products and Invention in the American System';
PART III THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS: BIOTECHNOLOGY PATENTS AND THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
9. Arti K. Rai (1999), 'Intellectual Property Rights in Biotechnology: Addressing New Technology';
10. Dan L. Burk and Mark A. Lemley (2002), 'Is Patent Law Technology-Specific?';
PART IV PATENTABLE SUBJECT MATTER;
11. Kevin Emerson Collins (2007), 'Propertizing Thought';
PART V EXPERIMENTAL USE;
12. Janice M. Mueller (2001), 'No ''Dilettante Affair'': Rethinking the Experimental Use Exception to Patent Infringement for Biomedical Research Tools';
PART VI THE ROLE OF SECRECY AND PHYSICAL EXCLUDABILITY;
13. John P. Walsh, Wesley M. Cohen and Charlene Cho (2007), 'Where Excludability Matters: Material Versus Intellectual Property in Academic Biomedical Research';
PART VII COMMERCIALIZATION OF PUBLICLY FUNDED RESEARCH;
14. Richard Jensen and Marie Thursby (2001), 'Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions';
15. Arti K. Rai and Rebecca S. Eisenberg (2003), 'Bayh-Dole Reform and the Progress of Biomedicine';
PART VIII INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND CONSUMER ACCESS;
16. Robert Cook-Deegan, Subhashini Chandrasekharan and Misha Angrist (2009), 'The Dangers of Diagnostic Monopolies';
17. Henry G. Grabowski, David B. Ridley and Kevin A. Schulman (2007), 'Entry and Competition in Generic Biologics';
Name Index;

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.