Search the Library Catalogue
The New Fourth Branch :
Tushnet, Mark V., 1945-
The New Fourth Branch : Institutions for Protecting Constitutional Democracy / Mark Tushnet, Harvard Law School, Massachusetts. - pages cm. - Comparative constitutional law and policy .
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Introduction;
Why a fourth branch? the structural logic;
Why a fourth branch? the functional logic;
Design issues in general;
Design principles in practice : A survey;
Anticorruption investigations : Case studies from Brazil and South Africa;
Electoral commissions : Case Studies from India, the United States, and South Korea;
Audit agencies;
Conclusion.
"Chapter Nine of South Africa's Constitution is titled, "State Institutions Protecting Constitutional Democracy." Its list of institutions that "strengthen constitutional democracy" includes the Public Prosecutor, the Human Rights Commission, the Auditor-General, and the Electoral Commission. Seen in the context of the Constitution's written text, these institutions form a branch on a par with Parliament and the President. Textual placement may not be important in itself. The authors of the South African Constitution were on to something important, though. They saw that the traditional Montesqueian enumeration of three and only three branches of government no longer identified the complete set of desiderata for institutional design. Dissatisfaction with the Montesquiean enumeration was apparent as well in Roberto Mangabeira Unger's False Necessity, published in 1987. That enumeration, Unger wrote, was "dangerous" because it "generates a stifling and perverse institutional logic...." The solution for Unger lay in multiplying the number of branches. He offered several examples: a branch "especially charged with enlarging access to the means of communication, information, and expertise," and a branch - labeled the "destabilization branch" - designed "to give every transformative practice a chance.""--
9781316517833 9781009048491
2021025423
Constitutional Law.
Independent Regulatory Commissions.
Separation of Powers.
K3289 / .T848 2021
342.04 TUS
The New Fourth Branch : Institutions for Protecting Constitutional Democracy / Mark Tushnet, Harvard Law School, Massachusetts. - pages cm. - Comparative constitutional law and policy .
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Introduction;
Why a fourth branch? the structural logic;
Why a fourth branch? the functional logic;
Design issues in general;
Design principles in practice : A survey;
Anticorruption investigations : Case studies from Brazil and South Africa;
Electoral commissions : Case Studies from India, the United States, and South Korea;
Audit agencies;
Conclusion.
"Chapter Nine of South Africa's Constitution is titled, "State Institutions Protecting Constitutional Democracy." Its list of institutions that "strengthen constitutional democracy" includes the Public Prosecutor, the Human Rights Commission, the Auditor-General, and the Electoral Commission. Seen in the context of the Constitution's written text, these institutions form a branch on a par with Parliament and the President. Textual placement may not be important in itself. The authors of the South African Constitution were on to something important, though. They saw that the traditional Montesqueian enumeration of three and only three branches of government no longer identified the complete set of desiderata for institutional design. Dissatisfaction with the Montesquiean enumeration was apparent as well in Roberto Mangabeira Unger's False Necessity, published in 1987. That enumeration, Unger wrote, was "dangerous" because it "generates a stifling and perverse institutional logic...." The solution for Unger lay in multiplying the number of branches. He offered several examples: a branch "especially charged with enlarging access to the means of communication, information, and expertise," and a branch - labeled the "destabilization branch" - designed "to give every transformative practice a chance.""--
9781316517833 9781009048491
2021025423
Constitutional Law.
Independent Regulatory Commissions.
Separation of Powers.
K3289 / .T848 2021
342.04 TUS