NLSUI OPAC header image

A Critical Study of Legal Framework to Regulate Misleading Advertisements in India: (Record no. 114586)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 10147nam a2200229Ia 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20251126123337.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 190809b2018 ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Transcribing agency nls
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Anita Ashok Patil
245 #2 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title A Critical Study of Legal Framework to Regulate Misleading Advertisements in India:
Remainder of title With Special Reference to Food, Drug and Cosmetic
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Bangalore
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. NLSIU
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2018
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 407p
505 ## - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE
Formatted contents note TABLE OF CONTENTS <br/>List of Abbreviations; <br/>Glossary of Case Laws;<br/>Table of Statutes; <br/>Chapter I Introduction;<br/>1.1. An Overview of the Advertising Industry in India;<br/>1.2. Meaning of Misleading Advertisement;<br/>1.3. Advertisements under Indian Constitution;<br/>1.4. Review of existing Literature;<br/>1.5. Statement of the Problem;<br/>1.6. Scope and Object of the Present Study;<br/>1.7. Hypothesis;<br/>1.8. Research Questions;<br/>1.9. Research Methodology;<br/>1.10. Sources of data;<br/>1.11. Style of Writing;<br/>1.12. Mode of Citation;<br/>1.13. Scope of Limitation;<br/>1.14. Significance of the study;<br/>1.15. Likely contribution of the study;<br/>1.16. Research Design;<br/>Chapter II Evolution & Development of Legal Regime on Advertisements and Consumer Protection in India;<br/>2.1 Evolution of Advertisements & Consumer Protection in India 2.1.1 History of Advertising in India;<br/>2.1.2 Purpose & Importance of Advertisement;<br/>2.1.3 Evolution of Consumer Protection in India;<br/>2.1.4 Online Advertisements;<br/>2.1.5 Trend of Online Advertisement;<br/>2.2 Forms of Misleading Advertisements;<br/>2.2.1 Comparative advertising;<br/>2.2.2 Bait Advertising;<br/>2.2.3 Surrogate Advertisements;<br/>2.2.4 Puffery 2.3 Indian Statutes impacting Advertisement;<br/>2.4 Statutory Regulatory Bodies Framework to Regulate Misleading Advertisement;<br/>2.5 Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI); <br/>2.5.1 Inception of the ASCI; <br/>2.5.2 Objects of the ASCI; <br/>2.5.3 Structure of the ASCI;<br/>2.5.4 Self-Regulation and Advertising Agencies; <br/>2.5.5 Self-Regulation Code by the ASCI;<br/>2.5.6 Enforcement of the Self-Regulation Code; <br/>2.5.7 Complaint Procedure under ASCI; <br/>2.5.7.1 How to lodge a complaint; <br/>2.5.7.2 Processing Procedure of a complaint; <br/>2.5.8 Effectiveness of ASCI; <br/>2.5.9 Legal Backing for TV Advertisements; <br/>2.5.10 Initiation of National Advertisement Monitoring Service (NAMS); <br/>2.5.11 Grievances Against Misleading Advertisements (GAMA);<br/>2.5.12 ASCI’s Success Story Statistics Analysis in 2016-17; <br/>2.5.13 Suo-moto action led to 65% increase in ads under ASCI scanner; <br/>2.5.14 Reforming the ASCI Codes; <br/>2.5.15 ASCI Recommendations and Lacunas; <br/>2.6 Regulatory Codes; <br/>2.6.1 Council for Fair Business Practices (CFBP);<br/>2.6.2 FICCI’s Norms of Business Ethics;<br/>2.6.3 Consumer Code of Association of Indian Engineering Industry (AIEI); <br/>2.6.4 Advertising Agencies Association of India (AAAI);<br/>2.7 Appraisal on Regulatory Codes; <br/>2.8 Conclusion;<br/>Chapter III International Standards on Advertisements in Food, Drugs and Cosmetics;<br/>3.1 Introduction; <br/>3.2 United Nations Guidelines on Consumer Protection (UNGCP); <br/>3.2.1 Objectives;<br/>3.2.2 Legitimate needs;<br/>3.2.3 Legal Status of the Guidelines; <br/>3.2.4 Importance of UNGCP;<br/>3.2.5 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development;<br/>3.2.6 Revised United Nations Guidelines on Consumer Protection, 2015; <br/>3.3 United Nations Guiding Principles on Business & Human Rights, 2011; <br/>3.4 The International Consumer Protection and Enforcement Network (ICPEN);<br/>3.5 Food and Agriculture Organisation of United Nations (FAO); <br/>3.6 Agreement on Technical Barrier to Trade (TBT);<br/>3.7 Agreement on Application of Sanitary and Phyto sanitary Measures (SPM); <br/>3.8 Codex Alimentarius (CA); <br/>3.9 International Standard Organisation (ISO); <br/>3.10 World Trade Organisation (WTO); <br/>3.11 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT); <br/>3.12 Consumers International (CI);<br/>3.12.1 Core Consumer Rights;<br/>3.12.2 Take Action Initiative; <br/>3.12.3 The Junk Food Generation – A Survey; <br/>3.12.4 Consumers in Digital Age- A Campaign; <br/>3.12.5 UN Guidelines & Making it up to date - A Consumers International Initiative;<br/>3.12.6 ICPEN and Consumers International - A Critical Analysis;<br/>3.13 Conclusion; <br/>Chapter IV - Comparative Study on regulating Advertisements in United States of America and United Kingdom;<br/>4.1 Introduction; <br/>4.2 An Overview of Consumer Protection in regulating misleading advertisements in USA;<br/>4.3 Legal Regulation of Misleading Advertising in the USA; <br/>4.3.1 Federal Level Regulation; <br/>4.3.2 State Level Regulation; <br/>4.3.3 Californian Regulation; <br/>4.3.3.1 History of the Unfair Competition Law (UCL);<br/>4.3.3.2 Judicial Expansion; <br/>4.3.3.3 Jus Standi and Section 17200; <br/>4.3.3.4 An Overview of the UCL;<br/>4.3.3.5 Elements of a false advertising claim; <br/>4.3.3.6 Judicial Tests;<br/>4.3.3.7 Relationship between section 17200 and other Californian Consumer Protection Statutes;<br/>4.3.3.8 Exemptions and defenses;<br/>4.3.3.9 Remedies available under the UCL; <br/>4.4 Federal Trade Commission (FTC); <br/>4.4.1 Appointment; <br/>4.4.2 Enforcement by FTC; <br/>4.4.3 Adjudication;<br/>4.4.3.1 Deceptive Advertising 4.4.3.2 Corrective advertising; <br/>4.4.3.3 Nutritional advertising; <br/>4.4.3.4 Environmental Advertising; <br/>4.4.5 Rule Making; <br/>4.4.6 The Advertisement Substantiation Program; <br/>4.4.7 Counter-Advertising; <br/>4.4.8 Appeal and Complaint Procedure; <br/>4.4.9 Administrative Enforcement; <br/>4.4.9.1 Adjudication; <br/>4.4.9.2 Administrative Trials; <br/>4.4.9.3 Enforcing Final Commission Orders; <br/>4.4.9.4 Rule making; <br/>4.4.9.5 Judicial Enforcement;<br/>4.5 Judgments adjudicated by the Regulatory Bodies;<br/>4.6 India-US Comparison;<br/>4.7 Position in United Kingdom;<br/>4.7.1 A Brief Overview of Consumer Protection in the United Kingdom;<br/>4.7.2 Statutory Regulatory Regime;<br/>4.7.2.1 Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations, 2008 (CPR)<br/>4.7.2.2 Business Protection from Misleading Regulations, 2008 (BPR)<br/>4.7.2.3 Enforcement Mechanism under the CPRS & BPRS; <br/>4.7.2.3.1 Enforcing Authorities;<br/>4.7.2.3.2 Tools for Enforcement;<br/>4.7.2.3.3 The Advertising Self-Regulatory System; <br/>4.7.2.3.4 The Advertising Codes; <br/>4.7.2.3.5 The Non-Broadcast Code;<br/>4.7.2.3.6 The Broadcast Code; <br/>4.7.3 The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA); <br/>4.7.3.1 Preventive Control Measures; <br/>4.7.3.2 Complaint Redressal Mechanism 4.7.3.3 Sanctions to Ensure Compliance; <br/>4.7.3.4 ASA Adjudications; <br/>4.7.4 Judgements under the CPRs and BPRs;<br/>4.7.5 United Kingdom-India – A Comparison 4.7.6 Conclusion; <br/>CHAPTER V Analysis of provisions of Misleading Advertisements under Food Safety and Standard Act, 2006;<br/>5.1 Introduction;<br/>5.2 Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (Repealed);<br/>5.3 Instances of Misleading Advertisements in Food;<br/>5.4 Need for Food Safety Standard Act, 2006?;<br/>5.5 Analysis of provisions on Misleading Advertisements under Food Safety and Standard Act, 2006;<br/>5.6 Judicial view on misleading advertisements under FSS Act, 2006;<br/>5.7 Case Studies;<br/>5.7.1 Nestle Maggi Noodles;<br/>5.7.2 Soft Drinks and Fast Foods;<br/>5.8 FSS Act-A Success?;<br/>5.9 Reforming Procedures under FSS Act;<br/>5.10 Comparison of the FSS Act vis-a-vis Legislations in US & UK;<br/>5.11 United States of America;<br/>5.12 United Kingdom;<br/>5.13 Conclusion;<br/>Chapter VI Analysis of provisions on Misleading Advertisements under Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954;<br/>6. Introduction;<br/>6.1 Instances of Misleading Advertisements on Pharmaceuticals;<br/>6.2 International Framework for Misleading Advertisements in Pharmaceutical Sector;<br/>6.3 Misleading Advertisements on Pharmaceutics in US 6.4 Historical Background, Development and Need of Drugs and Cosmetics Act;<br/>1940 and Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954;<br/>6.4.1 Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Act, 2008;<br/>6.4.2 Recent Instances on Misleading Cosmetic Advertisements ;<br/>6.4.3 ‘Truth about Lipsticks’ –Toxic metals in Beauty products; <br/>6.4.4 Legislative Framework in India; <br/>6.4.5 The Judicial Approach in India;<br/>6.4.6 The Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954;<br/>6.4.7 Critical analysis of the provisions of the Acts through case laws. 6.4.8 Criticisms and Recommendations for Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940;<br/>and Drugs and Magic Remedies Act (Objectionable Advertisements), 1954.;<br/>6.5 Conclusion;<br/>Chapter VII Critical Analysis of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and Consumer Protection<br/>Bill, 2018 with reference to misleading advertisements in India;<br/>7.1 Introduction 7.2 Consumer Protection in India 7.3 Analysis of provisions of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with reference to Misleading Advertisements;<br/>7.3.1 Definitions of Consumer, Misleading & Misleading Advertisements 7.3.2 Adjudicatory Mechanisms, Common Approachable Forums & Penalty Provisions.;<br/>7.3.3 Amending the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 & insertion of newer provisions to counter misleading advertisements;<br/>7.4 Challenges in Consumer Protection in India; <br/>7.4.1 NLSIU Students v. Government of Karnataka, High Court of Karnataka; <br/>7.4.2 Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration (IIPA); <br/>7.4.3 Report of CUTS International; <br/>7.5 Need for an amendment to Consumer Protection Act, 1986; <br/>7.6 Consumer Protection Bill 2018: An Overview;<br/>7.7 Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA): Analysis of provisions;<br/>7.8 Recommendations for Consumer Protection Bill, 2018 to regulate misleading advertisements;<br/>7.9 Conclusion;<br/>Chapter VIII Empirical Study on Misleading Advertisements, Consumer Awareness on Legal<br/>& Regulatory Mechanism in India with reference to Food, Drugs and Cosmetic;<br/>8.1 Introduction;<br/>8.2 Methodology;<br/>8.4 Questionnaire Method;<br/>8.5 Interview Method; <br/>8.6 Observation Method; <br/>8.7 Data Collection;<br/>8.8 Data Analysis; <br/>8.9 Testing & Validation of Hypotheses; <br/>8.10 Conclusion; <br/>Chapter IX Conclusion & Recommendations;<br/>9.1 Overall Conclusion;<br/>9.2 Recommendations.<br/>
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Consumer
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Misleading Advertisements
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
General subdivision Drugs
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Geographic subdivision Food
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Prof. (Dr.) Ashok R Patil - Guide
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://dans.nls.ac.in/handle/123456789/2244">https://dans.nls.ac.in/handle/123456789/2244</a>
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Thesis
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     . .   08.08.2019   PhD080 08.08.2019 08.08.2019 Thesis